Difficulty in selecting between HV segmentation and classical(LV) segmentat

[former_member184510]

Hi All,

I am in a dilema to select between the HV seg. or the old LV one. Can anyone tell me is it feasable to work on LV segmentation with 20million plus BPs.We need it only for BP segmentation.Will the performance be affected drastically if we use LV seg.I am just trying to understand the pros and cons of both the solutions(i.e, hv and lv seg). It would be great if someone can give me more clarity on this so that we can choos ethe right solution for our client.

thanks!

[klaus_brengel]

Hi,

for 20M+ BP I would strongly recommend to use HV segmentation. The performance will be dramatically better than with LV segmentation.

Best Regards

--klaus

[former_member184510]

Thanks a lot!

Is there any such capacity for LV seg to be used.I also heard that after some time there will be no LV and HV seperately. It will be all HV seg in the CRM syste. Is that right?

[klaus_brengel]

Hi,

starting with CRM 7.0 EhP1 there will be one single UI for HV and LV. You decide via the usage which one is used. However, if you want to use HV segmentation, you must have a TREX server up and running, whereas LV runs without. I dont know exactly what you mean by "Is there any such capacity for LV seg to be used". HV segmentation will always be faster.

Best Regards

--klaus

[former_member184510]

Hi,

By capacity i meant the Bp handling capacity.If , say, i have requirement for 1.5 million BPs, does it really make sence to use HV?

Apart from the performance and the extra features .( The customer may not want so many features just some simple TG creation within these 1.5 million BPs)

Regards,

Aneesh

[klaus_brengel]

Hi,

for LV segmentation you might run into memory problems because all the BPs of a Segment / Target Groups are kept in main memory when evaluating the segment. This is definitely a problem for 20M, but might work with 1.5M. This depends on the complexity of your selections and your system setup.

Best Regards

--klaus

[former_member184510]

Once again thanks Klaus for your inputs.