cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

1 Invoice / 2 Line Items / Different Item Categories & diff exchgn rte

measum_kumail2
Participant
0 Kudos

hi,

there are 2 line items in my invoice and both have different item categories. one item cat (ZFIX) have exchange rate setting in copy control "PricingExchRate type" as A and other (ZFLT) have "C". now exchange rate are maintained in OB08 and are determined correctly in my billing documnet. but whenever i post the billing document to FI, exchange rate for "Billing Date" is determined for both line items. however the expected result was that exchange rate for 1st line item should have been determined as per sales order date( as copied in billing documnet).

hope my queery is clear. any comments to resolve the issue?

Edited by: Robert on Mar 4, 2011 8:29 AM

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Lakshmipathi
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Whatever you maintain copy control ends with billing document. FI postings will be based on ob08 settings only and I dont think system will consider VBRK or VBRP exchange rate when posting to FI. Needs to be tested.

thanks

G. Lakshmipathi

measum_kumail2
Participant
0 Kudos

let me add more comments to my query.

whenever i create separate invoices for my two line items(Fix rate and floating rate) then exchange rate is determined as per exepected. however when i create a single invoice for two line items, then exchange rate results are different.

Former Member
0 Kudos

I had a similar problem before. The FX rate for the FI document is determined based on the invoice posting date, whatever you select in the copycontrol. The copy control setting is only for the SD internal conversion of i.e. pricing condition currency into document currency.

The only choice in the Sap standard is to manipulate FI FX Rate my knowledge to set the Rate in the sales order (billing document tab in header or item, Field Exchange rate for FI postings).

Hope this helps to clear your issue.

Regards

TDI

measum_kumail2
Participant
0 Kudos

thread closed. no solution