Settlement from Internal Orders to assets

[Former Member]

Hi Experts,

This is a scenary already designed where an Internal Order has in its settlement rule an asset under construction, which receives monthly a partial settlement, via KO88. At the end of Internal order life, also via KO88, costs under AUC should migrate to a final asset but sometimes I'm receiving error : theres nothing to be setteled. What´s true, because costs were flew from Internal Order to asset under construction but should also flow from AUC to final asset.

Has someone had found same error or could give me an idea what´s about?

Tks

Patricia

[Former Member]

Hi pgama,

Have you set the settlement type as 'FUL' in the settlement rule for respective order ?

[luis_rocha2]

Hi Patricia,

note also transaction KOB5 to define rules to settle to the final asset. After these rules are defined you would be able to use transaction KO88 to also settle to the final asset (or send back some of the costs from the AuC back to cost centers if they were not to capitalize at the end)

best regards,

Luis

[ajaycwa1981]

Hi Patricia

1. CHeck your Int Order in KOB1 - After settlement, the balance in it should be zero

2. If the order balance is zero, settle the AUC in the same period as the Internal Order... If there is balance in the AUC for the same period, this error can never come

Br, Ajay M

[Former Member]

Hi Ajay,

Thanks in advanced for your reply.

Let´s see if I got correct understanding taking an Internal Order which had worked on this scenary: Internal Order was settled at 2009/november, AUC had received a debit from KO88 at same period of course and a credit on july/2010, sending costs to final assets.

This is what u wanna mean? I understood that you said that debit and credit at asset under construction must to be at same period.

Tks again for your cooperation,

Patricia

[ajaycwa1981]

Hello Patricia,

Yes, this is what I meant...

1. While settling your AUC - there should be some values existing on the AUC to settle....

2. The settlement date of AUC should be on or after the Settlement date of Ko88

In your case, AUC received values on Nov2009 and fully released (settled) the values on July 2010...

If you now try to settle the AUC after July 2010, there should be some costs existing on the AUC, which I think does not exist in your case...

Br, Ajay M

[Former Member]

Dear Ajay,

So, I have though an Internal Order 285378 which was fully settled against a AUC ; this one has debit and when KO88 is processed to credit AUC and debit fixed assets system issues a error message saying that there are no balance at internal order. Since period for debit and credit AUC on my example wasn't the same, as explained above, some other idea?

Thanks, appreciatte your help,

Patricia

[ajaycwa1981]

Hey

While settling the AUC, you have to use AIAB and AIBU

Ko88 wont settle the AUC.. KO88 is meant to settle the Internal Order.... Since order is already settled, you are getting the error

Br, Ajay M

[Former Member]

Hi Ajay

Tks for your answer, help me a lot.

Cheers

Patricia

[Former Member]

Dear Ajay,

We have a similar situation as explained in this chain. Internal Order Balance zero. We have balance in the AUC. We are unable to transfer the balance of the AUC to Final Asset.

However, i cannot use transaction AIAB since we have summary settlement in the Investment profile. I get the message "Line item settlement is not possible for asset".

Also, i tried using the settlement AIBU i get the message "Allocation profile not maintained".

Could you please let me know how can i transfer the balance in the AUC to Final Asset.

Thanks & Kind Regards

Umapathi G

[Former Member]

Dear All,

Our issues is closed by choosing the Processing Type "Full Settlement" in the transaction KO88 itself. By this way we are able to transfer the balance from AUC to Final Settlement.

Thanks & Kind Regards

Umapathi G

[Former Member]

Please check whether at the time of settlement, you have correctly put in the settlement period.

[Former Member]

Yes, period for settlement is correct