Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

Payroll issue

Hi Gurus,

I have one issue reading a payroll. please help me out guys.

I am new to HR Functional.Hope u all help me.

Problem:

Imputed income for Group Term Life Insurance (wage type /Q01/BT1) needs to be excluded from the

calculation of Idaho unemployment (workforce development) taxes (/418/618/718).

please tel me the approch and what are the steps to exclude the wage type.

Thanks in advance

Regards,

Deepa

Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Related questions

6 Answers

  • Posted on Jan 19, 2011 at 05:28 PM

    If it is a US Payroll issue, perhaps your query should have been posted on the ERP HCM Payroll North America forum.

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Jan 19, 2011 at 07:08 PM

    Deepa,

    This is a tax model issue. Tax models in general revolved around the value in Processing Class 71 of each wage type being used (such as /BT1).

    Thereu2019s a good Wiki on tax models at the following URL:

    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPHCM/Taxability+Model

    Regards,

    Howard

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member Former Member

      Deepa,

      Look closely at the Wiki. Tax models are difficult to understand.

      We are doing many things like this with tax models. The State of Pennsylvania is an exception to many of the rules regarding the accumulation of taxable wages. Also, in the State of Ohio, the taxability of some wage types have been different for state taxes versus local taxes.

      Regards,

      Howard

  • author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Mar 14, 2011 at 03:54 PM

    We have received notice that Pennsylvania should not have the GLTL (group term life insurance taxable benefit) /BT1 included in the local or state wages.

    Does anyone have any information to help configure SAP NHP to exclude this benefit from the taxable wages for these?

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Posted on Mar 15, 2011 at 09:09 AM

    Hi,

    Payroll and it tax policy is unique in every country and attached to country grouping in SAP. could you mention ur country related with this payroll issue?

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Mar 15, 2011 at 05:05 PM

    This is a payroll issue for US for the state of Pennsylvania.

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Posted on Mar 16, 2011 at 09:17 AM

    is it related with tax policy changes from the government and secondary wagetypes calculated by the system?

    do some analysis using the detail payroll log - to identify the area affect the calculation.

    if it comes from the std sap, then you have to contact sap service market place and consult this change of regulation

    if it comes from the detail wagetypes characteristics that can be configured you can do changes in related area.

    Edited by: dhenny muliawaty on Mar 16, 2011 4:19 PM

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.