on 10-22-2010 3:48 PM
Hi All,
I have searched for related threads for ECC 6.0 but not found, so wrinting this thread.
I am using ECC 6.0 EhP4.
In Budget Report like S_ALR_87013558 and Commitment Report CJI5, system is showing incorrect commitment values against some POs. But for those POs already GRN/IV get posted.
Those POs are for Pre-Upgrade period. Is it related to Upgrade issue?
I have checked some OSS Notes but did not found any Note related to ECC 6.0 EhP4.
If anyone knows regarding this, please let me know. Correction programmes sequence/OSS Notes ?
Also I have tried RKANBU01,CJEN and CJBN in sequence in my Quality system for the same scenario (Copy of Pre-Upgrade). But its not working and some warning Message log is appearing in CJEN - Project Reconstruct Database as " No value category could be determined for commitment item xxx xxx xxxxxx"
Please suggest for the solution as early as possible.
Many Thanks in advance.
Swapnil Kharul
Good Evening Swapnil,
Were you able to resolve this matter? I am currently experiencing similar issue post EHP4 installation in ECC6.
S_ALR_87013558 report shows incorrect commitment values.
Any feedback will be appreciated.
Kind Regards;
Werner
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi All,
The following notes resolves the issue:
1491430 - Incorrect Commitments for Service Items
1492317 - Incorrect commitments after posting service entry sheet
This is a program error for Service PO's created prior to EHP4 upgrade.
PS - Just execute RKANBU01 once notes have been applied. Enter * in Order and Project Fields.
Kind Regards;
Werner
Hi
I am also facing same kinf of problem. In my case system is showing exactly same qty / value against PO line items in the report CJI5 and S_ALR_87013558 but those PO amt is nowhere matching with either Net PO amt / IV amt ..... considereed the Tax used for the items ... didn't get any clue ..... although the Qty it's showing is absolutly matching with PO / IV.
IN my case All the PO items showing in CJI5 is ticked with 'Del Completed' and 'Final Invoice'.
Can you pl have some idea on how system shows values in CJI5 against PO Items?
Thanks
Sanjib
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Try these correction programs....might help....
ZKAOIDE0 (SAP note 100409)
RKACOR04 (SAP note 21649)
ZKAOIDE2 (SAP note 334851)
Dharmesh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Dharmesh,
Its occuring for two cases now.
In PO Final Invoice and Delivery Completion is also ticked then also its appearing in CJI5 Report.
(But not for Open Items Only indicator Ticked.) This indicator is not ticked on.
Then tried to Close the WBS Element, system is giving error message as - There is still a purchase order commitment for WBS XXXXXXX.
But all PO/PR are Closd for this WBS Element.
Please suggest asap.
Many Thanks.
Yes there is some problem with EHP 4.0 upgrade perticualry for commitmetn functionality. I have also faced similar issue. Let me know which kind of PO is this Service Po / Material PO and are you using multiple accountatn assignment or not ?
I have faced this issue with service PO with multiple account assignment moslty Resoved the same with some notes. But I am awating for code to test in Prod environment and it's counter effect so, not shared soluiton. You can check the details about it in question posted by me. Provide me above informaation, if your case is relvant than I can help you.
With Regards
Nitin P.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
For any commitment issue first you need to confirm that is it reporting issue or Commitment issue. If you are line item - CJI5 and total : S_ALR_87013558 bot hare showing the same values or different ? Also check on which Costelemnt this values get reported etc. I understnad your case is different than mine. while running CJEN which error / information message no . you are gettting. If you share above infomration I can help you little bit further otherwise you can create OSS.
With Regards
Nitin p.
Hi Nitin,
Thanks once again for your valuable reply.
Actually S_ALR_87013558 report is showing some commitment value and while in CJ20N when trying to Close the WBSE its giving an error message as "There is still a purchase order commitment for WBS XXXXXXXXXXX".
CJI5 is not showing any Open Items but S_ALR_87013558 report is showing some Commitment value.
Only for one cost element these values are coming in report.
And in CJEN following warning message is appearing -
No value category could be determined for commitment item 1000 S101 650000
Message no. HF405
Swapnil Kharul
when you run CJI5 make sure, you are not restricted by date range, also check whether all the value types related to commitment are selected in CJI5 input screen, click extras>select value type, if not select all the value types and then execute the report and see.
Also, check CJIA, this will give you payment commitment + actual payment. May be a payment commitment is still open for that WBSE.
If GR/IV is fully done, then try setting delivery complete and final invoice indicator in PO and then run correction program and see the reports. Also, the error message talks about commitment item, what it refers to?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
Actually delivery complete and final invoice indicator is already ticked in those POs. But for some POs either one is tciked.
Also I am trying to Close the WBS Element and system shoots an error message as Commitment still exists for POs.
Please suggest.
Many thanks.
Swapnil Kharul
Hi,
Can you please check if the reports is showing the full PO amount as commitment or some partial amount. If it is partial amount, please check if it equal to the amounts mentioned under various tax codes in the Purchase order? If yes, please check the tax codes you are using, check that if there is flag set for 'accrual' checked in the tax code master.
Do revert,
Regards,
Mahendra
Hi All,
Any guess...?
Swapnil Kharul
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.