Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

[credit management] Wrong Update of S067

Hi everyone!

I read lots of postings here, but I just found several hints and no solution.

I set up a distributed credit management and everythings works fine except of one thing.

The updating of the table S067 doesn't work correctly.

The update group is set to 12.

After posting a the delivery the field "Open Delivery" in S067 contains the correct value of the sales order.

After posting the Invoice the open deliveries should be reduced by the value of the sales order again.

However, what happen is, that the open delivery value is reduced by the tax value of the sales order.

I will give you an example:

1) Creating a Sales order:

- net value = 900,-

- tax = 171,-

- gross price = 1071,-

- open delivery in S067 = 0,-

2) posting the delivery:

- open delivery in S067 = 1071,-

3) posting the invoice:

- open delivery in S067 = 900,-

Can anyone explain this behavior?

When I run the report RVKRED77 the value of the open deliveries is reduced by the net value of the sales order. So after running this report the value is correct.

I thought about missing sap notes. But all notes concering this topic are for older releases. We're using ECC 6.0

Thanks in advanced

Michael

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Follow
  • Get RSS Feed

2 Answers

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Oct 22, 2010 at 08:41 AM

    Hi Michael,

    This problem is in ECC 6.0 also. I faced similar problem 2 years befores and every time I get solution to run this report.

    Regards,

    Mukul

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Oct 22, 2010 at 08:51 AM

    There must be a solution.

    I know an ECC 6.0 system, which doesn't have this problem.

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member Gerard Magorrian

      Thanks for the hint!

      I looked for some notes related to "OLIKW" and I found the note 1403287, which might solve my problem.

      However, I not quite sure If I should implement this note, due to the fact that I have to implement 8 other notes before.

      Edited by: Michael K├╝hne on Oct 22, 2010 3:04 PM