Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

Garnishment rcord does not retro if Time Eval is already run in same period

Hi All,

We have observed disappearance of Garnishment due to the retroactive account not being triggered for the current period.

As a workaround we are currently deleting latest payresults manually for effected employees, updating IT 3 earliest personal record date of time processing to a previous date and then rerunning payroll.

We are wondering as to why retro was not triggered for the current pay result without having to delete the result and rerun it.This is due to the time evaluation already being run for the same period which we feel is incorrect as a time evaluation run should not effect retro of the garnishment record. Please advice.

Thankyou,

Subbaiah

Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Assigned Tags

Related questions

1 Answer

  • author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Oct 11, 2010 at 09:57 PM

    You can not change Garnishment records retro actively. It is always last check date of the employee and going forward.

    Can you rephrase what exactly you mean when you say "We have observed disappearance of Garnishment due to the retroactive account not being triggered for the current period".

    Arti

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.