Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

Accounting Integration for cProjects

Hi experts,

We have a major issue in cProjects and our delivery is pending because of this. For R/3 we are migrating from ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0. and we are upgrading cProjects from 3.1 to 4.0

This is regarding Scenario for Accounting Integration while activating Integration.

The Object tyoe we have defined is "0FIN_INT_SOC_R3 - Acct Int.: Single-Obj. Contr. in SAP R/3" with all relevant settings in backend. All settings relevant to "Integration Using Single-Object Controlling in SAP R/3 CO" are maintained in system correctly when we checked in ECC 5.0 and ECC 6.0 backend systems.

Now issue is we are In ECC 5.0 - while activating Integration we are getting Single-Obj. Contr. in SAP R/3 and No Integration as values in drop down Scenario for Accounting Integration.

In ECC 6.0 - we can only see vlaue as A Accounting Integration in mySAP ERP. but it should show "Acct Int.: Single-Obj. Cotr. in SAP R/3" as one of the Values.

My Question is : Is there any possibility that both Values are same but with different nomenclature in ECC 5.0 and ECC 6.0 system?

regards,

Prashant

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

2 Answers

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Oct 11, 2010 at 05:20 AM

    Hi,

    any ideas on this issue?

    regards,

    Prashant

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member Former Member

      Hi Sejo,

      Thanks for the input. Do you know any standard BAPI can be used to achieve this? Or is it possibel via any enhancment?

      May I knwo what are teh settings refered under SPRO >SAP xRPM >base System Interface >Application Object Settings >Map Base System Object Fields to SAP cProjects Fields?

      Can I use /RPM/PROJECTS_BATCH_UPDATE to update the cProejcts from PS Project?

      What actually the CLASS CL_DPR_FIN_GECCO_IAOM_SERVICES used for?

      Thanks Again

      psconsultant

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Oct 19, 2010 at 07:24 AM

    Hi Sejo,

    Thanks a lot for your response and efforts.

    I would like to tell you that as i already mentioned that we have checked and compared all necessary settings in both Backend systems, and i feel that there is a change in Nomenclature only. The issue could be related to Portal version.

    thanks,

    Prashant.

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded