Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

Lock Cost Element into a WBE element

Hi all,

I want to lock all movements (CO-FI-MM) for a WBE with a Cost Element. How to do this? It's possible with a GGB0 validation?

I'm thinking about put the Cost Element code in a WBE master data field (I don't know which one yet). Then create a validation that check in Co tables that all costs movements (not budgeting) for a WBE element has the correct cost element.

How to do this?

Thanks a lot. Regards

Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Related questions

4 Answers

  • Posted on Oct 08, 2010 at 06:52 AM

    Hi

    It is possible with CO validation in GGB0 where in you can give the cost element set for which there will not be any authorization for user to post. Check with CO consultant.

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Posted on Oct 08, 2010 at 08:26 AM

    It's possible with a GGB0 validation?

    It can be possible with CO validation.

    Cost Element code in a WBE master data field (I don't know which one yet).

    You cannot assign cost element in WBSE master data. What you should do is? If the CO document contains is posted with that cost element then check If WBSE is entered as the CO object.

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Oct 12, 2010 at 03:59 PM

    For example, I want to use the PRPS-USR00 field to insert the Cost Element code and create a validation that all the FI documents with that WBS element must have the Cost Element contained in the PRPS-USR00 field of that WBS.

    Can anybody help me?

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member

      Hi,

      I am not very sure about his but what you can do is rename the USR00 field to say, Cost Center and then make the filed mandatory. This will ensure that unless you enter the USR00 field you will not be allowed to proceed further.

      As far as inclusion of this user field in the FI docs is concerned i won't be able to comment much. Lets wait for others to share their views.

      Regards,

      Gokul

  • author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Oct 14, 2010 at 07:47 AM

    Hi,

    I think you can get your requirement using Co (GGb0 transaction). It would be something like that.

    Check COBL-PS_POSID <> '' OR COBL-PS_PSP_PNR <> ''

    Validation cobl-hkont not equal XXXXXXXX ( here you can enter a set)

    Regards,

    Sara

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.