on 10-06-2010 1:37 PM
Hi all
After applying support packages in CRM 2007 everytime a user creates a Business Partner in CRM Mobile Sales the Business Partner disappears after Conntrans.
When I look in smw01 I find the following two BDOC errors both with "Rejected (fully processed) CAPGEN_OBJ_WRITE F01"
When I look in details I found these error messages:
BDOC Error 1 :
- Enter at least one number for the business partner
Message no. R11123
- Validation error occurred: Module CRM_BUPA_MAIN_VAL, BDoc type BUPA_MAIN.
Message no. SMW3018
BDOC Error 2:
- Business partner with GUID 7AC82A878A5748B692960A0CA3BC41BC does not exist
Message no. R11124
- Validation error occurred: Module CRM_BUPA_MAIN_VAL, BDoc type BUPA_MAIN.
Message no. SMW3018
I found several other sdn threads with similar error messages but unfortunately most of them were either unanswered or no matching my problem.
Hope anyone can help.
Regards
Marco
The problem was caused by a bug. We could solve it with note 1472311.
I'm wondering why we didn't found that note before...
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi, Marco.
1. Set breakpoint at this module CRM_BUPA_MAIN_VAL and other who involved in middleware process.
2. Set RFC-user as dialog.
Try to change partner and you can see why system can not find partners with GUID.
Hope it's help.
Denis.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Denis
Thanks for your reply.
Unfortunately i didn't find something out with debugging.
But I think we found out what the error could be:
We tried to create a Business Partner in CRM Online (with transaction
BP). We wanted to create a relationship from BP to a employee Business
Partner ("Has the Employee Responsible"). We received the same error as
we see in the bdocs:
"Enter at least one number for the business partner" R11123
Then we saved the BP without the relationship and that worked well.
We think the error must be caused by the mapping of BUR011, isn't it?
Regards
Marco
User | Count |
---|---|
5 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.