cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Rejected (fully processed) BDOC errors when creating Business Partners

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi all

After applying support packages in CRM 2007 everytime a user creates a Business Partner in CRM Mobile Sales the Business Partner disappears after Conntrans.

When I look in smw01 I find the following two BDOC errors both with "Rejected (fully processed) CAPGEN_OBJ_WRITE F01"

When I look in details I found these error messages:

BDOC Error 1 :

- Enter at least one number for the business partner

Message no. R11123

- Validation error occurred: Module CRM_BUPA_MAIN_VAL, BDoc type BUPA_MAIN.

Message no. SMW3018

BDOC Error 2:

- Business partner with GUID 7AC82A878A5748B692960A0CA3BC41BC does not exist

Message no. R11124

- Validation error occurred: Module CRM_BUPA_MAIN_VAL, BDoc type BUPA_MAIN.

Message no. SMW3018

I found several other sdn threads with similar error messages but unfortunately most of them were either unanswered or no matching my problem.

Hope anyone can help.

Regards

Marco

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

The problem was caused by a bug. We could solve it with note 1472311.

I'm wondering why we didn't found that note before...

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi, Marco.

1. Set breakpoint at this module CRM_BUPA_MAIN_VAL and other who involved in middleware process.

2. Set RFC-user as dialog.

Try to change partner and you can see why system can not find partners with GUID.

Hope it's help.

Denis.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Denis

Thanks for your reply.

Unfortunately i didn't find something out with debugging.

But I think we found out what the error could be:

We tried to create a Business Partner in CRM Online (with transaction

BP). We wanted to create a relationship from BP to a employee Business

Partner ("Has the Employee Responsible"). We received the same error as

we see in the bdocs:

"Enter at least one number for the business partner" R11123

Then we saved the BP without the relationship and that worked well.

We think the error must be caused by the mapping of BUR011, isn't it?

Regards

Marco