cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Validity area specific output

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi All,

How to selectively output validity area specific values from value assignment type having multiple value instances with different usages? e,g. for a specific symbol in WWI template, if two vlaue instances (REG_WORLD & REG_EU) are maintained in the corresponding value assignment in the property tree, how to selectively output REG_EU specific data.

I tried all available options of using user exits, modules in master repeating group, slave groups, validity area & language etc, but nothing really help.

Also, tried to tweak generation variants usages from 0 through 3, but across the template there are different area-specific requirements. Hence changing usages only solve the problem partially.

Any quick help with sample WWI syntax would be highly appreciable.

Regards,

Pavan

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

christoph_bergemann
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hello Pavan

to my knowledge the simplest approach is to use the rating in the usage of the respective data records to gether with a minor adaption of the generation variant

Example:

data record 1 does have usage

A + REG_EU (A is the rating whatsoever techical key it might be)

Data record 2 does have usage

B + REG_WORLD (B is the rating whatsoever techical key it might be)

Now generation variant A is defined by using only ! rating A (with may be REG_EU as validity area) and generation variant B is using only rating B ! as the only rating (together with REG_WORLD).

Now independent of your choice (tweak generation variants usages from 0 through 3) in report 1 linked to generation variant A only data record 1 is shown and in generation variant B only data record 2 is shown

This is the normal WWI data selection process. No programming needed. etc. Only one "pitfall": you need further ratings

With best regards

C.B.

PS: the use of the "rating" in the generation variant and normally can be trained to the end user easily

Edited by: Christoph Bergemann on Oct 6, 2010 9:17 PM

Edited by: Christoph Bergemann on Oct 6, 2010 9:17 PM

Edited by: Christoph Bergemann on Oct 6, 2010 9:20 PM