on 09-23-2010 1:50 PM
Hi,
How is down payment value settled to AUC from the WBS assigned in the PO? We have a scenario where 2 separate down payment documents at different dates were posted against a PO. What we observe in CJI3 is that we have just 1 down payment document available against the WBS and which also gets settled to AUC on running CJ88 but the other down payment document does not appear in the CJI3 report of the same WBS (in a way does not hit the WBS and hence is not settled to AUC) .
Also, after posting the down payments in a PO, when we try to clear them using F-54 and process open down payment items we see the field WBS is populated only against 1 of the 2 down payment documents posted and hence we could see the same in CJi3. Why is it happening or what is it that is being missed here?
Regards
DP
closed
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Raised this issue in FI
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Down payments are not posted against WBS elements. These are direct financial postings. The cost are the debits on the order which are capitalised on the AuC
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
For this scenario there is setting need to be carried out in TRNX AO90, you need to create a down payment clearing G/L a/c, this is balance sheet account.
AO90 - ->Chart of accounts -> Account determination (here select the AUC line) -> Balance sheet -> down payment clearing account, here enter the G/L account.
Check whether this settings maintained in your system or not.
Praveen
hi,
I know about the way you told to see the Down payments in CJI3.
My question is, how is it that for one down payment, values appear in CJI3 and for another doesnt, when both the down payment documents correspond to the same PO and same Acount assignment. Please see my first posting to get more clarity
Regards,
DP
I replied to your second post
But my question is then how does the down payment appears in the CJI3 report
Also, I am aware of your initial post. I feel, the details you gave is insufficient. You have just said there are two down payments made against a PO one is reflecting in WBSE another one is not. It will be difficult for others to suggest you a proper solution, You will have to give more detials as how you made the two down payments and you should tell us apart from appearing in WBSE what are all the other differences ..etc., You should give as much details as possible.
I simualted your scenario, I processed down payment using FBA7, I am able to see the down payment in CJI3. My WBSE is geting populated correctly If i choose PO number in FBA7.
Just check this, Goto FBA7, and open your document number in Display mode and see whether PO number has been referenced or not. If not then it would not have considered the WBSE.
i have created several down payment docs with different Special GL indicators too but none seems to populate the WBSE field in the payment document, when using FBA7/F-48. All the down payment documents appear in the PO (Purchase order history) but only those which have been paid through F110 populates WBSE and the ones paid through FBA7 does not populate WBSE field. We are clear that the down payment documents are posted rightly w.r.t PO but its just that they dont get linked to the WBSE when FBA7 is used. Since your are able to see WBS in your system, there has to be some setting that i am missing. Appreciate your efforts in helping me on this.
User | Count |
---|---|
97 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.