Post different G/L when different MO type for the same stock material

[former_member712039]

Dear Experts,

Can I post differant G/L when Goods issue stock material with different MO type?

These are the steps that I want to do.

- Create MO no 1 with order type A and create MO no 2 with order type B.

- Both MOs have the same component(same material, same plant, same batch, same storage location)

- Post goods issued reference those MOs. The system will be credit the same stock account.

- *** I want to debit difference G/L account. ***

What can I do?

- Change G/L account before GI but it cannot change.

- Change G/L account in MO before it create reservation.

- Change movement type for this order type only.

Is there any BADIs or user exit to solved this problem?

Best regard,

Duangsamorn

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

This is possible only with the split valuation for the material.

You need to have different Valuation classes defined at and assign the valuation classes to the material master w.r.t valuation type.

Ex:

Material : M1.

V Type: GL1

V Type: GL2

V Class: GL01(this will have diff set of G/Ls for stock and consumption, and settings are done by the FI guys)

V Class : GL02

Now in the Create material master Accoutnting1 view give the valuation type GL1 and the v class GL01, perform the same for v type GL2 and assign GL02 in the V class of the material master.

Having done the above settings, at the MO level, in component tab mention the V type GL1 or GL2 as you require for the material in the Batch field.

Create a diff MO with diff V type as the batch in the MO.

Note: When you procure the material it should be w.r.t to the V type and you need to have the stocks maintained for V type GL1 and GL2 separately.

You have to discuss with the FI and MM guys for more clarifications on this.

Praveen

[rakesh_mane · Accepted solution]

Hello,

As per Praveen's suggestion Split Valuation Will work fine But for MASS change need to find any BAPI.

Regards,

Rakesh

[former_member712039 · Accepted solution]

Thanks for your help. But it's very hard to use that solution.

If I have two valuation type, I need to transfer stock from valuation type GL1 to GL2, every times, before I issue stock. That's double work!!

I'm thinking about creating program that automatic transfer stock before post GI. But I want to know if there is any solution.

[rakesh_mane · Accepted solution]

Hello,

Please refer the Thread

[]

Regards,

Rakesh

[former_member712039 · Accepted solution]

Hi Rakesh,

Now I used settlement rule to settle cost from MO to Internal order. If I enter the G/L account, cost will not be settled to IO.

I try to enter both G/L and IO but the system doesn't copy IO to accounting doc. I cannot use T-code OKB9 to default it because this IO different for each MO.

Thanks for you kindness,

Duangsamorn

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi,

In the above scenario you can follow like this:

Create the settlement rule with the receiver as G/L, double click that line, you will get the distribution rule details screen, you can find a field called Order, here you can enter the internal order number.

Here the IO stands as statistical and the real settlement receiver is G/L, but still updates the balance at the IO.

In this manner you can achieve your requirement.

I have tried the above in my system and working fine, after settlement, the order cost is shown at the G/L balance display report and the IO balance report.

Praveen

[former_member712039 · Accepted solution]

Hi Praveen,

Thank you for your help.

I try do that.

But when I do the settlement, it return error message "Account XXXXXX requires an assignment to a CO object"

First time, I talk to CO gay and he said we cannot do sth like that.

Now I found some SAP notes about this problem. I need to implement those notes unless the CO object will copy from OKB9 only.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

You can rectify this error with the OKB9 settings, but follow the FI/CO guy's instructions. You may enter a cost center or the IO number in OKB9, then your problem can be sorted out, but you have to cross verify with the FI/CO guy.

If you find a solution without OKB9 settings with the OSS notes, please do share the same for future reference in the forum.

Praveen