cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

PC00_M99_URMP issue with Garnishment

Former Member
0 Kudos

I am running third party remittance posting run for garnishments and getting thr following error for few employees.

For perno/ seqno 4323 237 not in GRDOC.

Please advice. How to fix this issue.

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Is there an issue with the vendor numbers for the employees involved?

Regards,

Howard

Former Member
0 Kudos

It shouldnt be a vendor issue because there are other employees using the same vendor and WT for whom there was no issue.

Please advice

Former Member
0 Kudos

If the master data hasnu2019t changed, perhaps someone has changed one of the tables. You can see many of the garnishment tables by using SM31, entering T5UG (with an asterisk before the T and after the G), and then pressing the dropdown.

There are some notes that you can identify by searching with "GRDOC", but they are all fairly old. You may want to review them.

Regards,

Howard

Former Member
0 Kudos

The above solution should resolve the issue but out of curosity, do these emp have sufficient funds to be remitted are they on leave can you check the non-exempt rule on 195

Regards

Roger

Edited by: Roger123 on Sep 7, 2010 3:34 PM

Former Member
0 Kudos

Please check the note below

Note 1493654 - 3PR: "For PerNo/SEQNO not in GRDOC" error in posting run

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

See the following threads:

Regards,

Howard

Former Member
0 Kudos

Does this employee have active garnishment results for the pay period you're running 3PR.

Arti

Former Member
0 Kudos

Yes,he has active garnishment.we have this issue first time.

No changes in garnishment record is made.please advice

Former Member
0 Kudos

Check the following:

1. Check if the wage type exist in RT of that pay period.

2. Check the 3PR config for the wage type.

3. Check PRCL 73 and 78.

Arti

Former Member
0 Kudos

The wagetype is present in RT. This shouldnot be issue with the WT because it is issue with just few

employees others are posted successfully to AP.Please advice