The use of materials with different types of evaluation in the orders of TORO

[cooler]

Good afternoon, friends. I ran into a problem. We have a merger of two plants into one. One plant manufactured spare parts for the repairs performed on the second, accordingly, there was no problem for the plant 1 refers to AUR with a plant 2 (with its price). Now for plant 1 there will be one OZM with two types of an assessment:

1) "purchased spare part "(for example: the price 100$)

2) "the made spare part " (for example: the price: 10$).

We cannot understand how we in the PM order to make a distinction on the types of assessment that when using the HSM with a view of assessing the "purchased parts" costs order was$ 100, and if you use the same eye but with the valuation type "manufactured parts" cost was 10$. Is it possible to do it as a standard, or need to develop?

[stephan_bantlin]

Hello

may be i misunderstood your questions as i am not aware of the abreviation you use (HSM, OZM , TORO)

if i understand your question right you intend to consume (Movement type 261) against an PM Order the material with a different valuations.

For this you have to create Valuation type for this material. When you add a component you are able to specifiy which valuation type you intend to consume or at latest you do this at the Goods issue. Than the different cost will appear on the PM Order.

Is this the business process you intend to describe?
If not i would suggest you describe tthe process you wish to implement again.

thanks

Stephan