cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

How to avoid workflow getting in error status due to check FM conditions are met

former_member427675
Participant
0 Kudos

Hello All ,

As per my workflow requirement ,when conditions met of not to trigger workflow in check FM ,I m rasing error due to which workflow is not triggering but in SBWP user seeing WF going in error status.

Please suggest me the solution to handle this so no workflow goes in error in this case.

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

keohanster
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Anjali,

If you are preventing a workflow from starting via a Check FM, then no workflow could start to be delivered to a user, at least technically speaking 🙂

What is the workflow application? What is the event? Can you show us the Event Log as well as a screen shot of the user's inbox?

Good luck,

Sue

former_member427675
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Sue ,

My issue is I want to debug check FM and understand where is the issue ,as when I run standalone check FM it is working as expected .but when I run with standard trasaction it is not giving output as expected and running workflow.

Thanks in adavance