Tax indicator is wrongly picked

[Former Member]

Dear Gurus,

Greetings.

The issue is in OVK1 we have assigned JCST and JVAT for INDIA.

Customer C1 has

JCST = 1

JVAT = 1

Material M1 has

JCST = 1

JVAT = 2

The Condition record in VK11 is:

CONDITION TYPE COUNTRY PLNT REGION REGION TAX CL IND u2013 CUST TAX CL IND - MAT AMOUNT UOM

JVAT______________IN___________01__________01__________0_________________1________0______%

JVAT______________IN___________01__________01__________1_________________1_______14.5_____%

JVAT______________IN___________01__________01__________1_________________2________4______%

In a sales order with Customer 'C1' and Material 'M1', Country 'IN', Plant Region '01', Region of Customer '01', system is correctly picking JVAT condition type, but the problem is, system is picking JVAT indicator for 'C1' as '1' and for 'M1' as '1' with Condition record value as 14.5% instead of the desired 4%.

If I change the master data as

In Material Master the combination for Material M1 is:

JCST = 1

JVAT = 2

In Customer Master the combination for Customer C1 is:

JCST = 0

JVAT = 1

Then system is picking JVAT indicator for 'C1' as '0' and for 'M1' as '1' with condition value as 0% instead of the desired 4%.

What I understand from this is that system is picking the indicators of JCST and not of JVAT, this is puzzling especially since system is picking the Condition type correctly as JVAT.

Please help me out here Gurus. If you need anymore details please let me know.

Regards.

Venkat - Hyd

[Former Member]

Closing the thread since no more replies. If anyone has any more info on my issue, plz plz send it to me.

Regards

Venkat - Hyd

[jignesh_mehta3]

Dear Venkat,

In the Sales Order, go to LIne Item Details - Billing Document Tab.

Here you will find Tax Classification Boxes, maintain "2" for JVAT manually (select the Box as per the Sequence - in your case it would mostly be second box)

Then go to Condition Tab & you will see that system has picked 4% Condition Record (if the Record is maintained properly)

Also in the JVAT Condition Type, there would be a Access Sequence Assigned.

Go to that Access Sequence & check it the Exclusive Tick Mark is there for al lthe Accesses (except the last Access)

Hope this helps...

Thanks,

JIgnesh Mehta

[Former Member]

Thanks Jignesh and Sanjay for your replies.

Dear Sanjay Singh:

The values in OVK1are

IN = JCST

IN = JVAT

The values in OVK3 and OVK4 are

JCST = 0 (Nil Tax)

JCST = 1 (Full Tax)

JCST = 2 (Partial Tax)

JVAT = 0 (Nil Tax)

JVAT = 1 (Full Tax)

JVAT = 2 (Partial Tax).

Dear Jignesh:

If i change the Tax Classification in Billing Document tab, system is picking the correct value, but what about the auto picking by the system? System should pick the correct value originally no??

In JVAT access sequence is assigned as ZTAX and ZTAX has table 368 (Country / Plant Region / Region / Tax Cl Cust / Tax Cl Matl) and since there is only one access sequence available there is no need to put the Exclusive Tick, but still I gave a tick mark, just in case, that is, yes the tick is available.

Most of the Customers come without C form, so i want to give JCST=2 in the CMR and since the customer is relevant for VAT, I want to give JVAT=1.

But when we make a sales order, instead of picking the JVAT=1, system is picking JVAT=2 (this is the indicator of JCST).

Some one pleaseee tell me why this is happening and what to do to prevent this.

Thanks and Regards

Venkat - Hyd

[Former Member]

Venkat,

You need to use table 375 in your access sequence. You issue will be resolved. Since in OVK1 you have 1 jas CST and 2 as VAT, you need to use the tax cl2 for customer and tax cl2 for material while determining VAT condition records.

Please let us know if this solves your issue.

Thanks

Chetan

[Former Member]

Dear Chetan,

Even after using the Tax Cl 2 system is picking the wrong value as before. Any other solution?

Regards

Venkat - Hyd

[Former Member]

Dera Venkat,

Check yr sequence in OVK1 & also customer & material taxes in OVK3 & OVK4.

Pls revert after checking throughly.

Regards

Sanjay