Application Development Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Explicit enhancement implementation has status OFF - How to switch to ON

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear experts,

I created an explicit enhacement from ENHANCEMENT-SECTION MM07MFL0_LOHNBEARBEITUNG_04 SPOTS ES_SAPMM07M in the include MM07MFL0_LOHNBEARBEITUNG.

In the dev environment, the enhancement implementation works well.

In the test environment, the enhancement implementation does not work.

I checked and found that, my enhacement does not belong to any switch and its switch position is blank too.

I guess blank is OFF in this cases because I check and found all other enhancement implementation in this include are OFF.

I cannot change the switch position from blank to ON.

Please guide me how to make this works.

Thanks,

Khanh

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Khaliachika,

Please check TCODE SFW5 will help you on this. just i have gone through the some blogs. there this TCODE is mentioned for activating and deactivating Explicit enhancements.

Please have a look on the below link

[http://fuller.mit.edu/tech/EnhancementFramework.pdf]

Edited by: Prasath Arivazhagan on Jun 18, 2010 6:13 AM

2 REPLIES 2

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Khaliachika,

Please check TCODE SFW5 will help you on this. just i have gone through the some blogs. there this TCODE is mentioned for activating and deactivating Explicit enhancements.

Please have a look on the below link

[http://fuller.mit.edu/tech/EnhancementFramework.pdf]

Edited by: Prasath Arivazhagan on Jun 18, 2010 6:13 AM

0 Kudos

Hi Prasath Arivazhagan,

We solved this issue!

This is a very weird issue in our testing system. We saw that the explicit enhancement implementation in testing system is Active version but in fact it is not active.

We activated it manully in testing system and now it works.

Thanks for your respond.

Thanks,

Khanh