Skip to Content
Former Member
Jun 10, 2010 at 03:38 PM

generic vs. specific userID in PI Interfaces


Hi All

We have many interfaces that are running between R3 and PI. Due to recent performance problems in R3 system, Basis team wants to differentiate between which application is causing and suggested to create Interface specific user id vs ALEMASTER which is used now.

Can anyone suggest if this is best practice to use PI Interface/application specific user id in PI channels or use a one channel with ALEMASTER. I know we have to create that many RFC destination and PI channels...which might bring down performance of the system connectivity.

Also for RFC channels we use logon groups with specific application servers on it.

Any inputs on this is appreciated.