Skip to Content
0
Former Member
Jun 07, 2010 at 09:52 PM

Batch Job BTCH_RSORAVSH vs. TCOLL entry RSORAVSH

714 Views

Hi All,

I just found job BTCH_RSORAVSH (report /SDF/RSORAVSH) is running hourly on our system. Our TCOLL table contains report RSORAVSH per Note 966309 (Contents of table TCOLL in SAP_BASIS 700).

Is job BTCH_RSORAVSH (report /SDF/RSORAVSH) really necessary? It seems that SAP_COLLECTOR_FOR_PERFMONITOR is running RSORAVSH hourly due to the TCOLL entry, so I'm wondering if anybody recommends one or the other, or both.

All the SAP Notes I viewed were ambiguous on this - Note 549298 from 2002 says RSORAVSH is obsolete and should be deleted from TCOLL, and that /SDF/RSORAVSH was its replacement. However, the more recent Notes say RSORAVSH should be part of TCOLL, but I didn't see any mention that RSORAVSH has now replaced /SDF/RSORAVSH.

Many Thanks,

Ian