on 05-20-2010 9:25 AM
Hello Consultant
As we known, planning strategy is incdluing two elements( requirements type for PIR; Requirement type for customer requirement) path:SPRO>Production>Production Planning>Demand Management>Planned Independent Requirements>Planning Strategy>Define Strategy)
In you experienced project, if PP consultant was in charge of config "Reqmts type for indep.reqmts" and SD Consultant shoud be in charge of Config"Reqmt type of customer reqmt "?
or PP Consultant should be responsibled for two parts configuration? including(Reqmts type for indep.reqmts/Reqmt type of customer reqmt).
Please advice.
Benny
Edited by: benny zeng on May 20, 2010 10:26 AM
Hi,
PP consultant is in charge of config "Reqmts type for indep.reqmts" and SD Consultant is in charge of Config"Reqmt type of customer reqmt". Planning strategy is a integration of PP & SD.
Regards,
Suhas
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear ,
PP consultant is the in charge of Planning Strategy -Define Planning Strategy (SPRO) based on the Requirement Type(OVZH) and Requirement Class(OVZG) for for sales Item categoery under basic function of SD module .
Now , most of the parametrs which have activated or relevent from sales side (Req.Transfer ,Account Assingment Categoery , Customer requirement type , Order Type etc) are configured in OVZG by SD consutnat and same has been assinged to requirement type in ovzg .
Once you did this , PP consultant will decide on the Planning Strategy group in SPRO-MRP-PIR and check wether respective parametrs are flowed in that strategy .
So i would rather say , its a combine effort based on the clinet requirement .
Regards
JH
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Benny,
In few of our SAP R/3 and ECC projects, both the settings were configured by PP consulant, after having due consultantion and agerrement with SD consultants.
SOP was commonly done jointly.
We did sometimes had discussions about ownerships , however , above arrangement worked fine.
I hope this gives insight.
Regards
Datta
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
92 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.