Undesired inbound delivery SPLIT

[Former Member]

Hello,

Consider that we have to purchasing document for two different material and the same supplier,

for one of my purchasing document I changed the vendor Fax number==> this operation leads the system to populate the field EKKO-ADRNR

During the creation of inbound delivery with reference to both document, system will split the inbound deliveries as the field EKKO-ADRNR is different

Do you have any proposal how to trunarround this split

Thanks in advance for your help

Best Regards

Meher

[eduardo_hinojosa · Accepted solution]

Hi,

Althougth it's not the same, perhaps it will suggest the soltuoon. Check Note 339412 - VL04,ME2O,CNS0,MBRL: Unwanted delivery split

Read the solution:

If a vendor is entered as an partner in a delivery-creating application - for example, in deliveries for subcontracting - but the vendor is not intended as the partner of the delivery, a delivery split occurs because of a deviating partner. In this case, the delivery split can be prevented by assigning the partner function for the vendor to the partner procedure for the delivery type used (Customizing Transaction VOPA). The vendor is then copied to the delivery. A satisfactory solution to this problem is still unavailable at present.

I hope this helps you

Regards

Eduardo

Edited by: Eduardo Hinojosa on May 11, 2010 10:53 AM

[Former Member]

Hello,

The inbound split based on the Vendor address at Purchasing document header (Field EKKO-ADRNR) is standard functionality added by SAP through OSS 667436

To turnaround this functionality, we can use the include LV50SF08

at the beging of this include, we add an enhancement point that will erase the field. XKOMDLGN-ADRNR_LI

XKOMDLGN-ADRNR_LI = ""

As a result system will ignore value of Vendor adress number at Purchasing Document Header

Best Regards

Meher

[Former Member]

Thanks Sudhakar

For my case (which standard SAP), it is for standard purchase order for external supplier,

Regards

[Former Member]

Hi ,

I have seen some OSS note around this issue in past..unable to recall..

Thanks,

sudhakar

[Former Member]

Hi ,

This was happeneing on Stock transport orders in my case ...

Thanks,

sudhakar