on 05-08-2010 4:01 AM
I have two tax depreciation areas that were fully depreciated at data migration. They both have the same useful life, same expired life, and same depreciation key.
I made several partial retirements to the asset affecting both depreciation areas this year. One depreciation are shows some of the retired accumulated depreciation as a value adjustment for prior year depreciation and some as ordinary depreciation.
The other depreciation area shows all of the retired accumulated depreciation as a value adjustment.
Why would the one area show some as ordinary when everything is the same and there have been no other transactions since migration. I should mention that the asset was acquired in 1992 with a 7 year useful life.
I found the issue.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
sounds strange, and I wouldn´t know why this happens ... I guess the transaction in both depreciation areas were posted by using the same transaction type?
blaz
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
98 | |
12 | |
10 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.