DPRs and DPs are reducing the commitments creatd by POs in Funds Management

[anand_shenoy]

In Funds Management, Purchase orders are creating commitments. Then Down payment requests and Down payments are created against these purchase orders. Hence, these Down payment requests and Down payments are reflected in the Purchase order history. But these down payments and down payment requests created with reference to Purchase Orders are reducing the commitments created by the Purchase orders in Funds Management. The business requirement is that only GR should be reducing the commitment and then consuming the budget. Down payment requests and Down payments should not have any impact on the commitment created by Purchase orders. How to do this ?

[iklovski]

Hi,

Please, refer to this

Regards,

Eli

[anand_shenoy]

But this question is for excluding value types 58 and 61. But even after excluding these Value types, the DPs and DPRs in PO history are reducing PO commitments and this reduction is happening in Value type 51 (i.e. PO value type).