REM Routing set-up for SFG & FG

[bear_boy]

Hi all,

I just want to ask a question on what is a more logical set-up in REM, to have 2 separate routings for the FG and its SFG, where there are final backflushes for both, or 1 long routing where both routings of FG and SFG are combined, where the last operation is the final back flush of the FG and there is a reporting point back flush in the middle of the routing, for the SFG?

Thanks in advance!

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Dear Bear,

what i understand a little bit from your query

1) the reason for maintaining two Rate-Routings with two different Group Counters is

if a material can be processed on two lines at a time then we maintain two lines

2) i.e Combination of Bom & Rate-Routing is Production version

3) so per the Lot sizes defined in Production version system will check the demand qty & Pick

the Production version in MRP

4) so if you want to distribute the total qty into two PV's then you can go with MF50 ( Planning table )

Regards

Madhu Kumar