Detailed list per profit center in FAGL_FC_VAL

[Former Member]

Hi,

we are on ECC6 and have a question relating to foreign currency revaluation.

If we run transaction FAGL_FC_VAL the list that is returned shows the document lines, their historic rate, revaluation rate and the amount to be posted. However, this list does not take into account the correct profit center split.

The posting on the other hand does.

How can we get a detailed list that ties the posted amounts per profit center back to the original documents? Or can we get the first list to show us the ledger view rather than the entry view of the documents being revaluated?

Any help is appreciated!

Best regards

Sven

[Former Member]

Hi Sven

You need to go to the posting proposal to see this,

when you run FAGL_FC_VAL in test mode, you would get a button like "N Postings" in the menu bar on Top

(or use keyboard shortcut "Shift"+"F6")

click this button to see posting proposal, which would show the details of documents which would be posted according to each profit center

Regards

Sach!n

Edited by: Sachin Bhutani on Feb 5, 2010 3:19 AM

[Former Member]

Hi Sachin,

the question is in fact how can we tie back the postings to the original documents:

e.g. I have 1 custumer invoice. Document number 1 which through document split has received 2 profit centers.

On the first screen 1 get 1 line:

original FX rate reval FX rate

document 1 : 100 USD ,75 75 EUR ,80 80 EUR 5 EUR exchange rate difference to be posted

If I click on the postings button I see :

debit FX differences 3 EUR profit center 1

credit FX gain 3 EUR profit center 1

debit FX differences 2 EUR profit center 2

credit FX gain 2 EUR profit center 2

We are searching for a list that replaces the first list and looks like:

original FX rate reval FX rate

document 1 : profit center 1 60 USD ,75 45 EUR ,80 48 EUR 3 EUR exchange rate difference to be posted

document 1 : profit center 2 40 USD ,75 30 EUR ,80 32 EUR 2 EUR exchange rate difference to be posted

Thanks in advance for your answer.

Best regards

Sven