on 01-07-2010 6:23 PM
Hi,
GRC 5.1 is connected to QAS system and PRD system (R/3 4.6). There's only phisical systems.
Into ECC upgrade projetc we would switch Jco destination from R/3 4.6 (QAS) to ECC 6.0 QAS.
Any experience? I think that for GRC should be transparent. The Risk analysis data? After the switch need to do a new full analysis?
Thanks.
Massimo
Massimo,
This would be transparent to RAR (CC). You won't loose any data. It would be better to do a full sync or simulation to make sure that the connection is working fine.
Alpesh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Many thanks, I will let you know.
Massimo
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Massimo,
From my experience on impact of system upgrade/JCo destination switch, would recommend you to take care of following -
1) Ensure to bounce system (on system with multiple App servers I observed that sometimes changes are not reflected on all servers).
2) Verify/adjust your RAR connector settings(adaptive RFC).
3) Reimport the static text, permission files.
4) Rerun the full risk analysis.
I observed one issue after backend upgrade on our system - Alert generation job was failing while generating conflicting transaction alerts. We even logged a SAP message but, were not able to find any clue. The error mysteriously went away for few days and issue cropped in again. We were not using that feature so finally decided to turn it off.
Make sure you test thoroughly with QAS system before proceeding with production upgrade.
Regards,
Amol
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.