cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Tax condition(JVAT) of ship to party is not triggering in Sales order

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

Tax condition(JVAT) of ship to party is not triggering in sales order...

Scenario:

Tax condition types:

JCST- CST Payable

JVAT- VAT Payable GJ

Customer Tax classification for JVAT in OVK3:

1- VAT 4%

A- VAT 0%

B- VAT 2%

Material Tax classification for JVAT in OVK4:

0-Tax Exempt

1-Full Tax

In CMR for

Sold to Party:1001(Mumbai), In Sales Area Data(Billing Tab),we have

Country/Name/Tax category/Name/Tax Class./Descrption

IN / INDIA / JCST / CST Payable / 1 / CST 3%

IN / INDIA / JVAT / VAT Pay GJ / 1 / VAT 4%

In CMR for

Ship to Party:2001(Gujarat),In Sales Area Data(Billing Tab),we have

Country/Name/Tax category/Name/Tax Class./Descrption

IN / INDIA / JCST / CST Payable / 1 / CST 3%

IN / INDIA / JVAT / VAT Pay GJ / A / VAT 0%

Access Seq: JLST

Condition table : 368(Country/Region of Del Plant/Region/Tax class1-Cust/Tax Class1-Mat)

Condition record maintained for JVAT as IN/GJ/GJ/1/1 as 4%

Condition record maintained for JVAT as IN/GJ/GJ/A/1 as 0%

Now the sale(Shipping to) is happening in Gujarat..

In sales order

I entered SP:1001 and SH: 2001

When i check the pricing in sales order,condition type JVAT is triggering 4% which is not true as it as to pick 0%

Kindly guide me where i went wrong...

Regards

Azeez.Mohd

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Friends.

I found the solution...

Its customization mistake..

Solution:

When we have 'n' tax categories then we should have 'n' condition tables..

I have 2 tax categories: JCST and JVAT but i have only one condition table 368 which is wrong.. i should have 2 condition tables.. so i created another con. table 468 and assigned to access aeq JLST.

then when i create cond. record , we have to select the appropriate table then it will fetch accordingly.. in sales order..

with regards