For some reason we have to recreate this report using Crystal, and we realize that aging formula for 90-120 & 120+ was difference from what std report shown. It was because of the aging formula in SAP not consistent with it's column header; for the 90-120 using (age >=90 and <120) and for the 120+ using (age >=120).
Is it a correct behavior or just another inconsistency in B1 ? We use B1 2007A PL45