cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Purchase requistion release problems with no release strategies set

suresh_subramanian2
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Dear all,

I am involved in purchase requisition workflow development without configuring release strategies.We cannot set release strategies as there are more than 4200 approvers depending on plant and the value of purchase requisition.So,I have used rule to pick the right agent.

Though this workflow behaves as expected,I do face following 3 problems.

Those are when the purchase requisition is under approval it should not be changed at ME52N or released at ME54N((we use custom field as release indicator) or deleted at MEMASSRQ

Please guide me how to over ride the above problems for which I will be grateful.

Thanks and regards,

S.Suresh

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

former_member554978
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

I didnt get your exact requirement...

But since its custom development for release...

you can check by sy-tcode for first two and use sy-repid for the third one.

like....

if not sy-tcode EQ 'ME52N'

Then..Release...

Endif.

suresh_subramanian2
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Dear Swaminathan,

Thanks for your reply.

My exact requirement is when the purchase requisition is under approval process, even the initiator should not be allowed to change or delete or release.

How to enforce such restrictions?Please guide me for which I will be grateful.

Thanks and regards,

S.Suresh

former_member193382
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hello Suresh Sir,

This can be achieved very easily. Just ask your functional to lock the document till its status is set to released.

Regards,

Raj

former_member554978
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

You can search for some exit or BADi befor SAVE.

Then you can incorporate the logic which i have given

suresh_subramanian2
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Dear Raj and Swaminathan,

Thanks for your suggestions.I have asked my functional to lock the created purchase requisition until it is released.

Thanks and regards,

S.Suresh

Answers (0)