cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Superannuation Perk

Former Member
0 Kudos

Configured superannuation perk using sap note 995880 and 1396661.when i am executing the payroll using forced retro from 01.04.2009.Perk isnot getting calculated correctly.

In test system i strated payoll from April month by month using basic salary 100000 and 15%.In the month of October system calculated 5000 as perk whic is correct.But In november it is showing only 15000 and the correct value is 20000.can any one suggest me

Thanks

Sasikanth

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (6)

Answers (6)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi all,

I have a question here. Does anyone of you encounter tax issue for resigned employees?

We have done all the configurations as per OSS note 995880 and 1396661 in April, 2010. During our testing phase, we found out that the Gross Salary (/416) is incorrect for final settlement for resignees.

We have a policy to clear all the outstanding payments after few months employee has resigned. In the last active month, the total Gross Salary (/416) is 1,268,870.97 which is total cumulation from Annual Regular Income (/410) and Annual Perk (/413)

Last active month below is the Gross Salary:

RT

/410 Ann Reg Inc 1,190,322.58

/413 Annual Perk 78,548.39

/416 Gross Salar 1,268,870.97

Then months later, we payout the prorated bonus for financial year 2010 and the Annual Perk (/413) is not populated so the total gross salary amount did not include the Annual Perk amount computed in the last active month.

The following months, employee no longer active but we payout prorated bonus of Rs150k and it is part of Irregular income:

RT

/410 Ann Reg Inc 1,190,322.58

/411 Ann Irr Inc 150,000.00

/416 Gross Salar 1,340,322.58

The correct and expected result should be:

/410 Ann Reg Inc 1,190,322.58

/411 Ann Irr Inc 150,000.00

/413 Annual Perk 78,548.39

/416 Gross Salar 1,418,870.97

Did you test out this scenario during the implementation phase? I need help to resolve this or else the affected employees tax will be incorrect.

Regards,

WS

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

Check the CRT, there the cumulation is done...

also check node

Former Member
0 Kudos

Sujesh,

/127 and /413 both are not holding the cumulative amount.

Alnijar,

I checked the notes and did the configuration according to that but the taxation is not working for SuperAnnuation.

please suggest how to proceed. I am blocked now.

Edited by: Shruti Jain on Apr 19, 2010 12:44 PM

Edited by: Shruti Jain on Apr 19, 2010 1:04 PM

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Shruti,

Check thoroughly the 3 Notes and configure accordingly.

Then Execute Payroll in Display Log Mode, & check whether the mentioned rules are working or not...

Check the status after execution of Rule ZSAN.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Alnjar,

I checked all the configurations again. they all look fine.

Also, i did the payrun in simulation mode and checked for the rule ZSAN, it is getting executed but i still do not see any taxation happening.

where do i look for it?

Also, on seeing the logs i found that ZSUN is not getting executed for the WT 9SAN.

Please suggest what could i be missing.

Thanks in advance,

Regards,

Shruti

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Shruti,

What message it is showing in the Rules (ZSAN, ZSUN & ZSNN) for processing Wage Types /3S1 & 9SAN.

Former Member
0 Kudos

For Rule ZSAN:

/3S1:

Rule ESGPCR VaKey Operation

ZSAN * WGTYP?

ZSAN * /3S1 ADDWT *

ZSAN * /3S1 ADDWTE9SNC

ZSAN * /3S1 AMT+C 9SNC

ZSAN * /3S1 AMT-IZSALT

ZSAN * /3S1 AMT?0

ZSAN * /3S1 > AMT-C 9SAN

ZSAN * /3S1 > ADDWTI9SAN

9SAN:

Rule ESGPCR VaKey Operation

ZSAN * WGTYP?

ZSAN * **** ADDWT *

For Rule ZSUN:

/3S1:

Rule ESGPCR VaKey Operation

Calculation rule not processed for wage type

9SAN:

Rule ESGPCR VaKey Operation

Calculation rule not processed for wage type

In a normal(non-retro) scenario, ZSNN is not being processed.

Hope this helps.

Thanks again.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi

9SAN will store excess contribution for that month. It will not cumulate in that particular wage type. Cumulation will happen only in wage type /127 and /413. Each month excess contribution only will be stored in that particular wage type 9SAN in RT.

Regards,

Sujesh

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Sasi,

The Annual Perk (/413) does not cumulated. In the INTAX function. it will look for /127 is written to /413. That's why the wage type 9SAN not cumulated to /127 and /413.

      • /413 Annual irregular perk (will be equivalent to /127)

PERFORM get_wtype USING '/127' annual_perk.

PERFORM put_wtype USING '/413' annual_perk.

The annual perk will work as your expectation if the INTAX function logic work like Monthly Irregular income (/125).

IF ge_switch EQ 'X'.

IF resd_status EQ 'X'.

annual_irregular_income = annual_irregular_income + ge_annual_irr_income + ge_td_irr_income.

ENDIF.

ENDIF.

PERFORM put_wtype USING '/411' annual_irregular_income.

Regards,

Wee San

jayantvenkata
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Kudos

Hi

Please check that the processing class and cummulation class as applicable have been maintained correctly for the wage type so created,i.e.9SAN.based on this ,the Wage Type '9SAN' holds the Excess Superannuation Contribution Amount and it stores this Excess amount in the cluster tables (RTand CRT) which will be cumulated to /127(Annual Perk) Wage Type.

Thanks and Kind Regards

Ramana

jayantvenkata
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Kudos

Hello

Can you please check that SAP note 1396661 has been implemented correctly and completely in your system ,

Please read the note carefully and confirm that the note changes are done as mentioned.

Thanks and regards

Ramana

Former Member
0 Kudos

hello,

Based on the note I had configured.do i need to pass to any other wage type or do i get populated in the annual perk wage type.In the annual perk it is not getting accumlated.

Thanks

Sasi

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello Sasi,

I am facing the smae problem, were you able to resolve it?

If yes, how?

Thanks for the help

Regards,

Shruti

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Shruti,

If you are implementing the note in mid of the year .you get these problem.for that i had created a wage type in infotype 0014 and added to the perk amount.

Thanks

Sasikanth

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Sasi,

Please elaborate on the steps u did.

Also, I was planning to implement form 01-apr, which is beginning of FY for India.

Reagrds.

Shruti