Unable to convert sender service to an ALE logical system

[Former Member]

Hi all

I have the next escenary jms to xi to IDOC and the XMB_MONI transaction give me the following message:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>

- <!-- Call Adapter

-->

- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">

<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>

<SAP:Code area="IDOC_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_INV_SND_SERV</SAP:Code>

<SAP:P1 />

<SAP:P2 />

<SAP:P3 />

<SAP:P4 />

<SAP:AdditionalText />

<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />

<SAP:Stack>Unable to convert sender service to an ALE logical system</SAP:Stack>

<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>

</SAP:Error>

This interface is without BPM.

The steps that whe do are:

1.- import the idc "ZRUIFMESS" from IR

2.- in the trx IDX2 we try to create the metadata and we cant do this, and show us this message:

You have no authorization for basic basic types

(activity 03)

Please I wait for your answers...

thanks a lot

Regards.

[JaganMohan]

Dear Gerard,

Please refer the following blog.

/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/29/xi-error--unable-to-convert-the-sender-service-to-an-ale-logical-system

Also the following link gives you the configuration details:

Regards,

JP.

[Former Member]

Hi all...

Frist, thanks for your answers...

It's ok... I will to check and perform your suggestions to solve this problem and feed back the results soon.

Thanks a lot again.

[Former Member]

Hi,

Double click on the service.

On the right hand side, go to Service->Adapter-Specific-Identifiers.

Check if you have given Logical System name and other details correctly.

If you have not assigned them or given wrong details then you get that error.

Regards,

Vishal

[rajasekhar_reddy14]

Hi

Search in sdn,the same question anwered many times,

Check that the logical system name is correctly maintained in the SLD ,and do header mapping receiver agrement,and compare logical system name in Adapter specific identifiers.

Regards,

Raj