Application Development Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Movement type: Authorization checking procedure

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello,

I want to check the Users with 321/322 movements types, I know that authorization object is M_MSEG_BWE but I donot know how to check.

Our basis person is off, Please suggest how to check and pathways.

regards,

JPS

4 REPLIES 4

Former Member
0 Kudos

If your Basis person is away then where is the security person or their support? Some steps are below, main thing is using SUIM, it's very easy so have a play with it to ID exactly how you want report on the data.

You can get this information using transaction SUIM -> Users by complex selection criteria -> enter the auth object in the appropriate field, hit enter and then enter the movement types. you can also enter activity 01 & 02 if you are looking for people who can perform the procedure.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi ,

The best way to get this is Search for the roles in SUIM ---> Roles by Complex Selection Criteria -


> Selection by Field name . Put Filed name BWART values 321/322. This will list down the roles with the given values and then check who are the users with these roles..

I hope this will solve your problem..

Thanks

SK

0 Kudos

>

> The best way to get this is Search for the roles in SUIM ---> Roles by Complex Selection Criteria -


> Selection by Field name . Put Filed name BWART values 321/322. This will list down the roles with the given values and then check who are the users with these roles..

Out of interest, why do you want to choose roles & then get users from the assignment when running it against the user? Don't forget that the OP doesn't have much experience in this.

0 Kudos

Yes Alex,

You are right. It can be done directly with suim -- Users by complex selection criterion and then selelction by field and search on BWART and values 321/322.

JP follow a single approach inspite of two..:)