cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

oac0: force creation of transport requests

markus_staack
Explorer
0 Kudos

Hi, experts!

When making changes to content repositories, these changes can be added to transport requests by marking the desired content repositories and selecting "transport" (<Alt><Shift><F3>).

Obviously this will not be possible in a case where a content repository has been deleted ...

Is there a way to switch transaction oac0 to a mode, where a transport request WILL be created automatically?

Thank you and best regards, Markus

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Markus,

In this scenario, it is very logic that the system pop's us with a transport request. I think the system should definitely not take it automatically.

Ravi

markus_staack
Explorer
0 Kudos

Hello!

Actually I recall having seen this once in one custmer's ERP 4.7 (I think v 200) - however I don't remember how they siwtched the system to always ask for a transport request in oac0 nor can I find a way to make ECC 600 to behave in this way.

Solution would be greatly appreciated, since:

1) all changes to Q/A and P should be made by tranport requests

2) openeing the system is not acceptable

Thank you and best regards, Markus

Edited by: Markus Staack on Nov 23, 2009 9:36 AM

markus_staack
Explorer
0 Kudos

Hello, All!

Although I would not accept this as solution of the initial question, in the meantime we have found a viable workaround:

- Before deleting a content repository, make a minor change to it (e.g. change the description) and include it in a transport request

- now delete it and click the save-icon again

- release the transport request

- when you now import the transport request, instead of just the description being changed, the content repository is deleted.

Thank you and best regards, Markus

Edited by: Markus Staack on Nov 26, 2009 11:00 AM

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

markus_staack
Explorer
0 Kudos

since this is only a workaround and not a proper solution the status of this question is still set to "not answered"

Edited by: Markus Staack on Nov 26, 2009 10:59 AM