Skip to Content
0
Former Member
Sep 23, 2009 at 02:36 PM

Inactive MultiProvider

450 Views

Hello,

During transport of out BPC-solution we get the following warnings and errors:

InfoObject /CPMB/G8DJBGV__/CPMB/G8P6O8J does not exist in InfoProvider /CPMB/G8IGBLG; Assignment was deleted

Assignments for InfoObject /CPMB/G8DJBGV__/CPMB/G8P6O8J have not yet been maintained -> Long text

InfoObject /CPMB/G8DJBGV__/CPMB/G8P9T79 does not exist in InfoProvider /CPMB/G8IGBLG; Assignment was deleted

Assignments for InfoObject /CPMB/G8DJBGV__/CPMB/G8P9T79 have not yet been maintained -> Long text

InfoObject /CPMB/G8DJBGV__/CPMB/G8PBR8Z does not exist in InfoProvider /CPMB/G8IGBLG; Assignment was deleted

Assignments for InfoObject /CPMB/G8DJBGV__/CPMB/G8PBR8Z have not yet been maintained -> Long text

InfoObject /CPMB/G8DJBGV__/CPMB/G8PC29V does not exist in InfoProvider /CPMB/G8IGBLG; Assignment was deleted

Assignments for InfoObject /CPMB/G8DJBGV__/CPMB/G8PC29V have not yet been maintained -> Long text

InfoObject /CPMB/G8DJBGV__/CPMB/G8PCUWX does not exist in InfoProvider /CPMB/G8IGBLG; Assignment was deleted

Assignments for InfoObject /CPMB/G8DJBGV__/CPMB/G8PCUWX have not yet been maintained -> Long text

InfoObject /CPMB/G8DJBGV__/CPMB/G8PM9Z4 does not exist in InfoProvider /CPMB/G8IGBLG; Assignment was deleted

Assignments for InfoObject /CPMB/G8DJBGV__/CPMB/G8PM9Z4 have not yet been maintained -> Long text

InfoObject /CPMB/G8DJBGV__/CPMB/G8PS386 does not exist in InfoProvider /CPMB/G8IGBLG; Assignment was deleted

Assignments for InfoObject /CPMB/G8DJBGV__/CPMB/G8PS386 have not yet been maintained -> Long text

Inconsistencies were found when checking MultiProvider /CPMB/G8MGBLG

Error activating MultiProvider /CPMB/G8MGBLG

Failed to create dimension attribute

As a consequence of this the MultiProvider in the test system is sometimes (but not always) inactive after transporting.

The reason for the messages is that several attributes are marked as navigational in the MultiProvider but not in the cube. But this is all controlled by BPC so it seems to be a bug. I don't know why BPC defines some attributes as navigational. I don't see why "navigational attributes" would have a meaning for BPC at all.

Has anyone else experienced this problem? Have you found a workaround?

Best regards,

Christoffer Owe