cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Error while computing Income tax components

Former Member
0 Kudos

hi all, im running PC00_M40_CALC after applying the budget note changes but it is giving me following error for some employees and also running retro. what could be the problem?

The error is

INTAX----> Processing -


>"Error while computing Income tax components"

thanx for ur reply...

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (6)

Answers (6)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi

I am getting the same error...

I have maintained 9VT1 in negative value last month.

And there is no tax liability ( running retro for the employee, he has resigned)

Can you please guide how to overwrite the error?

Thanks

Geeta

Former Member
0 Kudos

Your issue is resolved or not please let m eknow

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Gurus,

Can anyone tell me if there is any standard report for Indian Payroll system to display monthly income tax of an employee.

Regards

Amrit Raj

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

Please check with T.Code PC00_M99_CWTR.

We can get reports for required wage types.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Sir,

System is giving error in tax calculation only for retro employee. Check following things:

1 system is running payroll but tax amount,gross amount is not calculated properly.

2 Check in payroll result is there M89G,M89P,M89T wage typs generated by the system.

3 If above 2 is true then I will explain you how to rectify this error.

4 If above 2 is not applicable to your problem then forget about the all.

Subhedar.

Former Member
0 Kudos

>

> Dear Sir,

>

> System is giving error in tax calculation only for retro employee. Check following things:

>

> 1 system is running payroll but tax amount,gross amount is not calculated properly.

>

> 2 Check in payroll result is there M89G,M89P,M89T wage typs generated by the system.

>

> 3 If above 2 is true then I will explain you how to rectify this error.

>

> 4 If above 2 is not applicable to your problem then forget about the all.

>

> Subhedar.

Thanks for ur reply..

No the above two is not applicable bcoz their cluster is not generating,,,

thanks...

Former Member
0 Kudos

are u doing in Development Server or Production SErver ?

Did u made changes as per the Correction Instructions for the Budget Note?

Regards

...Sadhu

Former Member
0 Kudos

its production server and i have applied the budget changes which i have mentioned above.

thanx..

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Nilesh,

The error is becaz system is calculating negative monthly tax component. Please check the reason of negative wage type creation.

Regards,

Praveen

Former Member
0 Kudos

the negative value is bcoz the amount has been recovered.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Ok so wat i understand is u r trying to recover a amount through a wage type which u hav configured with INBTD function (that is TDS on irregular payment through regular run).

well u can't process the amount through that wage type as this functionality is just for the payments not for the recovery.

Even u dont need to bother if u are cumulating the recovery amount to ur monthly income wage types. as it will impact on your annual income and accordingly wil impact on tax (reduce in this case).

So if u will remove the wage type (or better way pass recovery through a different wage type which is not configured through INBTD), then it will solve ur purpose.

Let me know in case u hav any query!!!!

Regards,

Praveen

Former Member
0 Kudos

>

> Ok so wat i understand is u r trying to recover a amount through a wage type which u hav configured with INBTD function (that is TDS on irregular payment through regular run).

> well u can't process the amount through that wage type as this functionality is just for the payments not for the recovery.

> Even u dont need to bother if u are cumulating the recovery amount to ur monthly income wage types. as it will impact on your annual income and accordingly wil impact on tax (reduce in this case).

>

> So if u will remove the wage type (or better way pass recovery through a different wage type which is not configured through INBTD), then it will solve ur purpose.

>

> Let me know in case u hav any query!!!!

>

> Regards,

> Praveen

thanx for ur reply..

but when we r using medical allowance WT for recovery its working fine, but then why its not working in the case of /1111. whts the diff. betwn these two WT. why its not working in case of /1111.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Nilesh,

I will be stuck in a certain scenarios only.

System will calculate tax on the recovery amount and suppose its -1000 (for example). - calculated in INBTD

now if normal tax liability of the month is more than rs. 1000, then -1000 will be compensate by that +ive amount.

But vice-versa will create the issue and lead to the error as mentioned by you. PLz note that INTAX can't process teh negative tax.

Former Member
0 Kudos

>

> Nilesh,

>

> I will be stuck in a certain scenarios only.

>

> System will calculate tax on the recovery amount and suppose its -1000 (for example). - calculated in INBTD

> now if normal tax liability of the month is more than rs. 1000, then -1000 will be compensate by that +ive amount.

> But vice-versa will create the issue and lead to the error as mentioned by you. PLz note that INTAX can't process teh negative tax.

thanx for ur reply..

sory but i didnt get this and also i didnt find answer to my question which is "but when we r using medical allowance WT for recovery its working fine, but then why its not working in the case of /1111. whts the diff. betwn these two WT. why its not working in case of /1111." plz be more clear.

thanx...

Former Member
0 Kudos

>

> >

> > Nilesh,

> >

> > I will be stuck in a certain scenarios only.

> >

> > System will calculate tax on the recovery amount and suppose its -1000 (for example). - calculated in INBTD

> > now if normal tax liability of the month is more than rs. 1000, then -1000 will be compensate by that +ive amount.

> > But vice-versa will create the issue and lead to the error as mentioned by you. PLz note that INTAX can't process teh negative tax.

>

> thanx for ur reply..

> sory but i didnt get this and also i didnt find answer to my question which is "but when we r using medical allowance WT for recovery its working fine, but then why its not working in the case of /1111. whts the diff. betwn these two WT. why its not working in case of /1111." plz be more clear.

>

> thanx...

thanx for ur reply..

sory but i didnt get this and also i didnt find answer to my question which is "but when we r using medical allowance WT for recovery its working fine, but then why its not working in the case of /1111. whts the diff. betwn these two WT. why its not working in case of /1111." plz be more clear.

thanx...

Former Member
0 Kudos

well Nilesh,

it can stuck in certain scenarios.

can u tell me the value of /460 and other monthly tax WT just before INTAX processing. and also estimated regular tax for this month.

then i can explain u in a better way.

Former Member
0 Kudos

why not a single reply..??

thanx for ur reply...

Former Member
0 Kudos

Check teh INTAX function - T Code - pe04

Check in the schema where INTAX is used..it will help u...

Former Member
0 Kudos

what to do in PE04??

i didnt get it

thanks for ur reply