on 07-29-2009 3:54 AM
Hi Experts,
I'm am contemplating to assign P_ABAP to bypass all authorization checks for reports for our system batch ids that will be used for executing background jobs. My consideration is that if P_ABAP is utilized, unnecessary authorization checks during execution of the background jobs by these batch ids will be skipped and will improve our performance of the background jobs.
I want to seek advise if this is a recommended practice and if any experts have implemented similar set-up. I would also like to know if there is any risk that could result from such an implementation.
Regards,
Justin
In my opinion, there's some risk with doing this. A person with 'S_BTCH_NAM' authorization could easily run these reports in background job submitted as one of these batch ids which could really cause issues.
Rgds.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
102 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.