on 07-23-2009 8:30 AM
Hello,
Our customer is planning to change the cost method for all existing 2000 items.
We went through note 869071 and it seems that according to it, they need to close all open documents.
They have a lot of open documents for each item which means that it would be almost impossible for
them to close them all and then re-create them. Many of their sales and purchase documents have
references that go through approval processes and can not be just closed and re-opened with new numbers.
Please advise if there is a way to bypass this obstacle.
Thanks in advance
Revital
Hi
This is an I think moment.
We considered doing this in 2005 but we could not for 2 reasons:
1. any item linked to a BoM had to be removed from the BoM
2. you could not change the accounting method (costing method) if there was a transaction history for the current year.
It appears to have changed for 2007 and as long as the item has no stock then you can change the accounting method. If I was you I would create a duplicate database, export a list of all stock and current price to excel and use DTW to change all stock quantities to zero. Then use the stock valuation method window to change the method and re-import the stock quantities. There may be a small discrepancy on the GL as valuations differ slightly depending on what valuation is used.
If it works please let me know as I may propose that we make the change.
Regards
Stewart Clark
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
To Change the Item's Costing method, the only thing you need is to clear the OnHand quantities for the items.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi
The answer is NO . Otherway around is setting up a new company and transfer everything .
Hope this helps
Bishal
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
104 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.