Application Development Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

BASIS--to restrict authorization for a PO document type & 122 movement type

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear All,

Plz guide me how to restrict authorization for a PO document type & for a movement type 122 i.e. for eg. if a user has authorization for PO document type IC then he should not be able to rum movement type 122 for any T-code he runs.

Thanks in advance

Arpit

Basis

5 REPLIES 5

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Arpit,

Goods Movement type is normally used by MM consultants using MIGO tcode/ MB01 tcode.

We can restrict object M_MSEG_BWE for movement type through role assigned to particular set of users.

Regards,

Srinivasa P Sista

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

Your request was not too clear to me.. As per my unde

Here is some details of Authorization object related to Purchase Order:

Document Type in Purchase Order( M_BEST_BSA )

Purchasing Group in Purchase Order (M_BEST_EKG )

Purchasing Organization in Purchase Order (M_BEST_EKO)

Plant in Purchase Order (M_BEST_WRK )

Document Type in Outline Agreement (M_RAHM_BSA )

Purchasing Group in Outline Agreement (M_RAHM_EKG )

Purchasing Organization in Outline Agreement ( M_RAHM_EKO )

Plant in Outline Agreement ( M_RAHM_WRK )

This can be helpfull to you to restrict authorization to PO..

In Organization Level, it can be restricted by Purchasing group, Purchasing organization and plant..

Regards,

Sandip

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Srinivasa,

I have a same problem with movement type restriction but in QM especially tcode QA11..

Can i find object related to QA11 for movement type restriction via some tcode?

Thanx

0 Kudos

check in transaction SU24 which objects are checked/maintained for QA11. i did so in one of my systems and M_MSEB_BWA was not one to be checked, so i am pretty sure, QA11 would not react to it. however, i cannot test this, since we don't have QA configured ... so maybe you might want to adjust that object for QA11, but test first.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Mylene,

Thanx for your information..I'll try it first and inform the result as soos as possible...Thanx