I have an existential question regarding BPM's...
If message 1 starts a BPM and message 2 starts another instance of the same BPM later.
If the calls to the BPM are done using EOIO... will this assure me that the BPM's will run in sequence ?
This means, if a step in BPM instance 1 takes a long time and BPM instance 2 goes faster... it should wait for BPM 1 to go before continuing...
If not, why have EOIO ????
Is this actually stated somewhere in the documentation... ?
Edited by: Thierry Dagnino on Jul 21, 2009 5:36 PM