cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

SBO Aging Report characteristic

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Experts,

I had tried to create a Crystal Report that mimicks the SBO's aging report. I got the Grand Total for the Aging Amount correct... however I got the Sub Total for the Aging Amount in the duration of 0-30days, 31to60days, 61-90days..etc wrong.

For Eg.

SBO Aging Report shows:

0 - 30 days 31- 60 days 61- 90 days 91- 120 days Over 120 days Total

SGD 0.00 SGD 1000.00 SGD 1500.00 SGD 2000.00 SGD 500.00 SGD 5000.00

My Aging Report shows:

0 - 30 days 31- 60 days 61- 90 days 91- 120 days Over 120 days Total

SGD 0.00 SGD 500.00 SGD 2000.00 SGD 2000.00 SGD 500.00 SGD 5000.00

I have already maDe my Crystal Report aging amount filter by aging duration as 0-30days, 31-60 days... etc but I still get the above incorrect sum allocation as compared to the System's aging sum allocation.

Can anyone please help advice on this?

Much Thanks!

Warmest Regards,

Chinho

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Which date have you selected for aging? Comparing the detail records between two reports to see which records got different period with system record to find the reason.

Thanks,

Gordon

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Gordon,

Thank you for your reply.

I specified the report Aging date as 30/6/2009 and aging report based on Posting Date.

I have found a document posting date dated 1/April/2009. In my crystal report, this document is shown under the 31 - 60 days, but in the system report, this document is shown under 61-90 days.

Please help advice.

Warmest Regards,

Chinho

Former Member
0 Kudos

There is 31 days in May. So your calculation is wrong.

Answers (0)