Skip to Content
0
Jun 04, 2009 at 11:17 AM

Why M_MSEG_LGO with MTy 301 is not symmetrical?

40 Views

when transfer posting (MB1B, MTy 301) from storage location 3030 in plant 1000 to storage

location 8000 in plant 1910, authorization object M_MSEG_LGO is checked. The activity is 01,

movement type is 301, storage location is 3030, and plant is 1000. But when transfer posting

(MB1B, MTy 301) from storage location 8000 in plant 1910 to storage location 3030 in plant

1000, the fields of M_MSEG_LGO are also need to be set 01 for activity, 301 for movement

type, 3030 for storage location and 1000 for plant. Why not 8000 for storage location and

1910 for plant? If I set 8000 for storage location and 1910 for plant and do transfer

posting (MB1B, MTy 301) from storage location 8000 in plant 1910 to storage location 3030 in

plant 1000, the system says "You do not have authorization for this transaction in storage

location 3030".