on 06-03-2009 9:52 PM
Hello,
I am dealing with Garnishments of equal priority and same recieved date. In this
case, the system should determine the actual dedcutions as a % of the
total Garnishment dedcution. In such a case, the system treats them according to the
ratio of their dedcution amounts on their respective orders.
Example: Garnishments of equal priority and same recieved date. No sufficient disposable net amount.
IT 0195 Deduction Amounts
Garnishment Order # 1: 200$
Garnishment Order # 1: 300$
Allowable Disposable Net : 450$
Expected Result : Acutal Deductions will be :
Order #1 = 200/(200+300)*450 = 180
Order #2 = 300/(200+300)*450 = 270
But this is not happening in our processing with standard SAP
rules/shemas.
This is what is happening in our system:
Case 1: Error Type 1: Prorating one but not the other
Acutal Deductions are
Order #1 = 200
Order #2 = 250
Case 2: Error Type 2: Prorating both equally irrespective of the ratio
of the deduction amounts.
Acutal Deductions are
Order #1 = 225
Order #2 = 225
All the SAP notes provided (521207 - Q&A: Master Note for U.S. Garnishments; 369934 - FAQ: US Garnishment Processing; 534441 - FAQ: Understanding garnishment cluster tables; 524060 - FAQ: Understanding the garnishment payroll log) references that the standard SAP system should be able to handle the proration correctly and there is no need of customization.
Can anyone suggest me,
Inorder to achieve the expected result, should we customize the rules/schems?
If so, is it advisable to customize SAP delivered Garnishment rules/schemas?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Soujanya.
Hello,
Kindly check V_T5UG4, whether Equal amounts pay off processing is checked, then in that case it will not pro-rate where as it will Equal payoff logic is applied which is happening in your scenario 2.
Also check the customizing done in your system for feature UEQPY, Review documentation for more information.
With Regards,
S.Karthik
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Generally Prorata of the wage types will happen to IT0008
Check Processing Class 10 It shd be 01
and schema check XPPF
Iam not sure check
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
107 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.