Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

FI - PCA data reconciliation - difference

Hi all,

We have technically upgraded the system in the year Aug 2007 and activated u201CNew GL functionality u201C. In the process we have not de-activated u201CClassical Old GL functionalityu201D since we have not migrated the data from Classical G/Lu2019s to New G/Lu2019s. Both related tables are getting updated.

Our client has implemented SAP in the year 2000-01 and as of today is finalizing the Balance Sheet as per Business Area. As a year-end activity when we tried to match PCA data with FI data, there is a difference getting shown in Tcode u2013 KE5T.

To match the data we have executed

1. F.5D - Balance Sheet Readjustment Process

2. 1KEK - PCA - Trf Payables / Receivable.

But still difference is there from the year 2001. Need guidance on the following points u2013

1. Do we need to execute F.5D alone (without F.5E / F.5F etc) every time?

2. If any assignment is missing in Tcode u2013 3KEH? If that is missing and now if we have given

that then what about the data posted in past without assignment of default Profit Center in

Tcode u2013 3KEH?

3. In past, some of the expense G/Lu2019s have been posted without CO-object indirectly without

Profit Center attachment. u2013 How to transfer such amounts to Profit Center to tally FI-PCA

data.

4. Some of the Cost Centers have been created without attachment of Profit Center in it.

Afterwards Profit Center attachment given in that hence how to transfer that non-assigned

data to Profit Center accounting?

5. In OKKP u2013 Controlling Area setting u2013 Profit Center activated for the Year 2001 To 9999.

Same activation getting shown in Tcode u2013 u201C0KE5u201D u2013 u201CEC-PCA Controlling Area settingu201D for the

year 2001 only. Do we need to activate per year or one time activation like 2001 To 9999 is

acceptable?

6. What about Transaction Code u2013 1KEI / 1KEH etc?

Points will be assigned for the proper answer.

Regards,

Shridhar

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

3 Answers

  • Best Answer
    author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on May 01, 2009 at 09:48 AM

    1.Do we need to execute F.5D alone (without F.5E / F.5F etc) every time? YES in classic GL

    2. If any assignment is missing in Tcode u2013 3KEH? If that is missing and now if we have given

    that then what about the data posted in past without assignment of default Profit Center in

    Tcode u2013 3KEH? Earlier the data must have been posted to dummy profit center. You can use distribution cycle for that account and post from dummy to default profit center.

    3. In past, some of the expense G/Lu2019s have been posted without CO-object indirectly without

    Profit Center attachment. u2013 How to transfer such amounts to Profit Center to tally FI-PCA

    data. Same as point 2

    4. Some of the Cost Centers have been created without attachment of Profit Center in it.

    Afterwards Profit Center attachment given in that hence how to transfer that non-assigned

    data to Profit Center accounting?Same as point 2**

    5. In OKKP u2013 Controlling Area setting u2013 Profit Center activated for the Year 2001 To 9999.

    Same activation getting shown in Tcode u2013 u201C0KE5u201D u2013 u201CEC-PCA Controlling Area settingu201D for the

    year 2001 only. Do we need to activate per year or one time activation like 2001 To 9999 is

    acceptable?+One time activation+

    6. What about Transaction Code u2013 1KEI / 1KEH etc?

    Edited by: Chetan Gadhiya on May 1, 2009 11:49 AM

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member

      Hi Chetan,

      Thanks for the reply, points assigned to you. Your reply has finalised some of the transaction execution for which we were confused.

      Our client has made the requirement specific to match the Customer / Vendor / Asset balances with Profit Center instead of matching overall FI - PCA data.

      We have executed Tcode - F.5D and subsequently Tcode - 1KEK every year from 2001 and then after that Tcode - 2KES for transferring the PCA balance to the next year.

      1. In the year 2001, I found the difference (Only in the 4th period), which was due to the "Manual Posting" made to Profit Center Accounting (Since that data had document Type - A0 - std customization setting made for PCA). Please do correct me if I am wrong ?

      2. In the year 2002, if I execute KE5T with selection of "Display Differences Only" system is showing the difference but if I remove that selection, data matches between FI & PCA? Why such thing happens?

      3. In the year 2003 I am getting the difference between "Base Ledger " and "Comparison Ledger" for the period 1 & 12 only. Rest of the periods has been individually tallied between FI & PCA. Do you know the reason or the way to map the difference?

      4. In the year 2004 data is matching

      5. In the year 2005 again if I make the selection of "Display Differences Only" (in Tcode u2013 KE5T) system is showing the differences, currency wise namely, "EUR, INR, SEK, USD" etc. but if I remove that selection, data matches between FI & PCA.

      I have assigned points to you for your earlier feedback and will assign for the next answer also.

      Thanks & Regards,

      Shridhar

  • author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Apr 29, 2009 at 01:34 PM

    Hi all,

    Nobody is there to reply to my thread. We want to match FI with PCA as such - Customer / Vendor / Asset data initially.

    After executing F.5D & 1KEK, I found that:

    1. In particular period Profit Center Accounting is having entries with Doc. Type - A0 (SPRO setting for

    PCA document).

    2. In past, entries have been posted in Profit Center which are now "Inactive" as of today, system is

    showing warning message in that respect

    Regards,

    Shridhar

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Dec 15, 2009 at 09:57 AM

    Closing the issue

    Regards,

    Shridhar

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded