cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

We are on SolMan7.2 need to add/manage partners in SolMan using transaction BRF+

ymelda_lewis
Explorer
0 Kudos

Details: While working in SolMan7.2 in a Request for Change, I need to default the role of Reviewer in the Parties Involved assignment block, how do I make this change? Also, we have user groups specifically added to RC's for management approval. How do I update these list? I have searched the blogs, but none of them address this issue. Please send articles, blogs, etc to help me learn BRF+, as I used the Partner Determination procedure to accomplish this along with IB51,52 and 53 to view the partners - but I can't use these anymore

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

ymelda_lewis
Explorer
0 Kudos

Tom, sorry it took me so long to respond, but here goes.

In 7.1 I had access to the IB52 transaction to add partners for various productive clients, now that we've upgraded to 7.2 the partner function is changed. Now we have to use the BRF+ function, is that correct because I want to

1. I want to change the default partner in the solution manager - on the Request for change, i want to change in the Parties Involved assignment block default partner function entry from Dept/Agency to Reviewer.

2. I need to re-add our change manager back to the GoTo menu option in IB52 for each of our productive clients, but it is tied to the LMDB and I think I need to get with my basis manager to allow me in to add that functionality or do I do this via BRF+. I have read the blogs and I confess, this is mud to me. Can you help. thanks.....Em

shalinrogerb
Active Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Ymelda Lewis,

You can still add it in IB52, I too use the same and I don't see any change in functionality here.

TomCenens
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Ymelda

Are you sure that business partner determination broke? From SolMan 7.1 to SolMan 7.2 or?

We still use business partner determination in several cases on SolMan 7.2 and it's still functioning for what I'm using it for but I don't have exact same use case as you. I would find it weird to see this is no longer possible though, that's why I'm asking from where to where did you go that this doesn't function anymore?

Best regards

Tom