on 03-08-2009 1:13 PM
Hello Experts,
I'm developing a HTTP - Server Proxy synchronous scenario ( for price check of products ) and since the source applciation is not yet ready , I was trying to test with the HTTP tools I found in the forums.
I tried sending the message payload through the tool but it gives me a Operation Timed out error as result.We are having a proxy setup in office to connect to internet , so is that the problem?
2) I created a CC type HTTP as sender and activated .But this CC is not among the input list in the RWB-CC monitoring
Please advise.
Also if somebody can give me links to similar synch scenarios it would be really helpful for me to check my dev & configuration.Does this scenario requires a sender agreement?
Thanks,
Mathews
Edited by: Mathews Joseph on Mar 8, 2009 2:16 PM
Hi,
You can use this for your Refference...
/people/community.user/blog/2006/12/12/http-to-rfc--a-starter-kit
REgards
Seshagiri
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thank you everyone for all the inputs on testing the scenario...I was able to get the message in to XI,but gives me a strange error for which I couldnt find much information in other posts :
<SAP:Code area="OUTBINDING">CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_NOT_FOUND</SAP:Code>
<SAP:Stack>No receiver agreement found for sender -BS_AMD to receiver -DV1_015,urn:XXXXXX.MI_SAP_XXX_In_S</SAP:Stack>
I have two Mesg Interfaces ( out syn / in syn ) , one Interface Mapping with Request and Response,
source business service , target business system ,one CC ( adaptor - XI reciever for server proxy ) ,
Rec Determination , Rec agreement & Interface determination.
Can anyone give me some info regarding above mentioned error?
>
> Thank you everyone for all the inputs on testing the scenario...I was able to get the message in to XI,but gives me a strange error for which I couldnt find much information in other posts :
>
> <SAP:Code area="OUTBINDING">CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_NOT_FOUND</SAP:Code>
>
> <SAP:Stack>No receiver agreement found for sender -BS_AMD to receiver -DV1_015,urn:XXXXXX.MI_SAP_XXX_In_S</SAP:Stack>
>
> I have two Mesg Interfaces ( out syn / in syn ) , one Interface Mapping with Request and Response,
> source business service , target business system ,one CC ( adaptor - XI reciever for server proxy ) ,
> Rec Determination , Rec agreement & Interface determination.
>
> Can anyone give me some info regarding above mentioned error?
is your sender BS_AMD and receiver DV1_015 ?
then create a receiver agreement for this combination. also use the appropriate message interfaces.
Perform a full CPACache refresh using the following url with authorization of PIDIRUSER.
http://XIHost:JavaPort/CPACache/refresh?mode=full
Regards,
Prateek
but it gives me a Operation Timed out error as result
This should be network related problem or incorrect URL to send data to XI. Check the port details too in XI at smicm -> goto -> services.
We are having a proxy setup in office to connect to internet , so is that the problem?
This could raise a problem only if in case your http client tool resides outside your internal network. Otherwise this shouldn't be a problem.
I created a CC type HTTP as sender and activated
This is not required in your case.
But this CC is not among the input list in the RWB-CC monitoring
RWB could only monitor adapters based on Java stack. HTTP adapter is based on abap stack and therefore you cannot monitor it in RWB.
Does this scenario requires a sender agreement?
No sender channel, no sender agreement required.
Regards,
Prateek
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Also if somebody can give me links to similar synch scenarios it would be really helpful for me to check my dev & configuration.Does this scenario requires a sender agreement?
As sender HTTP Adapter resides on Abap stack ,Sender agreement is no need for this scenario..
you can test this by passing message directly to Integration engine through runtime work bench.
Runtim Work Bench -->Component Monitoring --> Adapter Engine -->Test Message
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/08/25/xi-sending-a-message-without-the-use-of-an-adapter-not-possible
Regards,
Pradeep A.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hey no need to create sender HTTP unless you require secure http .
For testing you can use either RWB or there is an HTTP tool in SDN forum WIKI may be you can use that too if needed
Rajesh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
>
> Hello Experts,
>
> I'm developing a HTTP - Server Proxy synchronous scenario ( for price check of products ) and since the source applciation is not yet ready , I was trying to test with the HTTP tools I found in the forums.
>
> I tried sending the message payload through the tool but it gives me a Operation Timed out error as result.We are having a proxy setup in office to connect to internet , so is that the problem?
If you are facing problems with the test tool use the RWB.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/33/b99eebd9261b4886d6f6a354b8dcdf/content.htm
> 2) I created a CC type HTTP as sender and activated .But this CC is not among the input list in the RWB-CC monitoring
>
> Please advise.
>
> Also if somebody can give me links to similar synch scenarios it would be really helpful for me to check my dev & configuration.Does this scenario requires a sender agreement?
>
> Thanks,
> Mathews
>
> Edited by: Mathews Joseph on Mar 8, 2009 2:16 PM
you dont have to create a CC for HTTP even though the option to create a HTTP sender is given:) so that means neither do you need a sender agreement. But anyway coming back to monitor HTTP,
you can use SMICM , then SHIFT+F1
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.