Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

Fiscal Year variant in Company Code have different end

oadb-settings.pngHi All,

We are in the process of migrating to S/4HANA and got an error while running the pre-migration check program RASFIN_MIGR_PRECHECK. The error is "Fiscal Year variant in Company Code XXXX have different end dates". We are using New GL and have created non-leading ledgers are per local requirements.

The Fiscal year variant (FYV) of the leading ledger does differ from the fiscal year variant of the non-leading ledgers. Hence we are getting the issue during the migration check.

We found SAP notes "2220152 - Ledger approach and Asset Accounting (new): Non-calendar fiscal year variant for parallel valuation" and "844029 - Inconsistent fiscal year variant with ledgers in the NewGL" which talks about creation of additional ledgers and ledger groups to resolve the issue.

Our queries are as follows:
1. Is the solution specified under notes 844029 and 2220152 are the only solutions available or are there are any solution which can be evaluated?
2. Suppose the solution available under the above notes is the only solution, and we have the current setup
Main ledger: 0L (FYV X1)
Non leading ledger: L1 (FYV Z6)

As per the solution we create the following:
New Non leading ledger : L2 (FYV X1)
Ledger Group Z1: L1 and L2 and make L2 as the representative ledger

We assign the new ledger group Z1 under parallel valuation in OADB to the local depreciation area. Our question is, prior to the change the local depreciation postings were happening as per the local FYV Z6, since ledger L1 was assigned to it. After the configuration change the local depreciation postings will happen as per which FYV, since it has now been assigned to the ledger group Z1, where the representative ledger is L2?



oadb-settings.png (48.4 kB)
Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

1 Answer

  • Jun 19, 2017 at 08:42 AM

    Hello Vivek

    We were planning to use this note.. Did you get answer for above query? Also the note talks about setting up a validation...Wondering whether it is mandatory

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member

      Hi Kishore,

      Yes, in S/4HANA this is mandatory and we did follow the instructions as mentioned in the note.