on 06-11-2018 9:07 AM
Dear Experts,
We have carry forwarded the last year open commitments (Open GR document) to Next year as invoice (54) value type through FMJ2. But in next year these documents are consuming current year budget amount from related commitment items as we didn't assign any new budget for these items. In carry forward activity only related line items has been transferred any document number not created. We are using payment Budget for controlling the budget.
Please suggest any way so that we can resolve and how to go ahead to resolve. We have ECC 6.0 EHP5 version.
Appreciate your time and support on this issue.
Regards
Jeetendra Tyagi
Yes, of course. GR carry-forward doesn't release any budget on year X if you use only one ledger (payment), as it remains consumed by the commitment (purchase order).
There are several ways of sorting it out... first of all, you have to make sure that you really need this CF; it would be only in the case you use PBET. Second, you can in theory carry-forward not only your GRs, but also your PO for the relevant GRs, even if they are fully consumed. Alternatively, you can play with different fund sources, distinguishing between the source of the budget in terms of the year. This should be analysed considering your business requirements...
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks Eli,
Yes we really need this CF. So now how we can resolve this issue, we are using FC & Commitment item for budget creation. Can you please elaborate "you can play with different fund sources" to correct/resolve the issue. Do we need to assign budget for these commitments?
Thanks
Jeetendra Tyagi
As I mentioned, you have to either carry-forward related POs, thus taking the budget they consumed along, or carry-forward these GRs to a different fund source, which would be exempt from availability control.
You won't have residual budget, that's the point. It is consumed by POs
You can only 'introduce' a new budget in X+1, but this will be not correct functionally-wise.
Are you using commitment and payment budget or only payment budget update profile?
In this last case, it is normal, that the budget is not carried-over as it remains being consumed by the purchase order.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Additionally, make sure that you have this note implemented:
1823688 - Commitment carried forward of goods receipts is not possible
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
As a general remark, please pay attention what you have set for your update profile. To start with, all this story about GR carry-forward is relevant only if you have GR/IR update in your profile (OFUP). Secondly, are you using PBET in your update profile? If not, then you are not obliged to carry-forward your GR. If you do use PBET, revise the notes for automatic GR carry-forward, starting from note 2004099 and related ones.
Regards,
Eli
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
To start with, GR document is not a commitment. Second, you can bring the budget along, when you make your carry-forward.
Regards,
Eli
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Eli,
Can we create a new commitment item for C/F items and assign the required budget for them in new year and reassign new commitment in carry forward documents so that budget amount would be reversed from the old commitment item & consume new commitment item budget.
Does this solution sounds good workaround for the issue. Need your suggestion on the same.
Please advise on the same.
Jeetendra
Hi,
As I mentioned, you can set up a flag in IMG setting 'Activate Budget Carryforward for Commitment' defining whether the budget consumed by a document in year X, will be carried-over to year X+1, when carry-forward is performed.
In this way, you won't have consumption of X+1 year budget.
Regards,
Eli
User | Count |
---|---|
15 | |
4 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.