BALANCE SHEET WITH UNASSIGNED NODES

[Former Member]

First of all hello everybody,

In spite of being involved with balance sheet and P&L query I´m facing a problem never had before. We´re using the virtual infocube 0FIGL_V10 and its own query provided by Business Content.

Up to yesterday everything worked fine and showed up balance sheet and its nodes properly according to report in ECC. FI consultants decided to make changes in Balance Structure and turned on both credit and debit indicators in a couple of nodes. From then on relationed accounts did not appear within balance sheet but below unassigned nodes, obviously it should work properly once updated data by means of signs and so on. I removed content and reload 0GLACCEXT (its hierarchy), 0GL_ACCOUNT and infocube 0FIGL_C10 and kept failing.

Even i checked if function module supported by 0FIGL_V10 was modified and not at all.

Does anyone know what´s wrong? Is a problem of ECC customizing (don´t think so but...)? Am i missing any step?

Any suggestion would be appreciated...

Thanks in advace.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

I´ve just checked FSV report and it showed up balance sheet properly unlike BI query.

I´m using a special ledger table to feed infocube 0FIGL_C10 by taking into account all needed stuff, as i told it worked fine and works if not considering these nodes with just one enabled (Debit/Credit) indicator.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

I take it you have done all the normal stuff -

run the report in rsrt in debug with cache off

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Also - what are the values of 0BAL_DEPEND for the "dodgy" fsv nodes in 0GLACCEXT (you did relaod this master data didnt you?)

[Former Member]

Thanks for your replies!

Simon you were right. By checking up 0BAL_DEPEND I found out that someone had disabled certain mapped fields in transfer rules...one of them was PLUMI -> 0BAL_DEPEND.

I found an article about an balance sheet sample with this field but i didn´t pay attention to.

I shall activate transfer rules and so on from BC again and hope solving it.

Thanks again.

[Former Member]

Dear Street,

We are facing the same problem as you did. Kindly let us know how you solved this problem.

Regards

Renu

[Former Member]

Yes, it is complete.

Let me mention I don´t explain the issue correctly. The problem came after disabling Credit flag and enablig Debit flag in order to show the account below certain node or other depending on the sign of the balance.

Could it be a ECC-side problem during customizing balance structure? As far as I know this is completely supported by virtual cube and its query.

[Former Member]

Can they prove for the FSV in R3 the change they made actually works - because all youa re doing is replicating that

ie do they have everything fall under unassigned when they run that FSV

[Former Member]

Is the change run complete ?