Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

Why do Quota Inconsistent programs change existing IT0416?

We are having an issue with inconsistent Quotas and were running program

RPTBPC10 but it was placing a wrong deduction date on existing 0416. Example below of deduction date needing to be 09/25/2015 - 09/24/2016 instead it pulled from the current balance.

I then ran HNZUPTC0 - quota inconsistency program and it fixed the IT0416 for the person above but for others it would always change their balance to the earliest absence quota which is incorrect. For example this deduction balance should have read 08/27/2015 - 08/26/2016.

Could someone explain these two programs, why are they changing existing IT0416 deduction dates?

r4mjp.png (65.9 kB)
xp4x2.png (88.9 kB)
Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

2 Answers

  • Nov 15, 2016 at 01:13 PM

    Hello Nia,

    I have same issue with the IT 0416 where the report RPTBPC10 is changing the deduction to the latest quota available.

    This was issue when we used Automatic compensation so we opted for Manual Compensation where we choose the quota it would deduct from then this issue doesn't arise. It still is manual however we have very few of these cases.

    I am still to get back to resolving this issue with our IT but the issue seems to be with the deduction rule. All the Report

    RPTBPC10 doing is that it allocates the leave as per the deduction rule .

    Not sure of report HNZUPTC0, there is another report which checks for inconsistences in Leave and Quota deduction


    Unlike IT 2001, IT 0416 doesn't seem to know which quota to be reducing from.



    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Nov 17, 2016 at 10:45 AM

    Usually 0416 records will get deducted from earliest Quota record of IT2006 let say 01.01.2015 - 31.12.2015 01.01.2016 -31.12.2016 when we try to create a record in IT0416 then it gets deducted from 01.01.2015 standard functionality to avoid this define deduction priority then it gets resolved.



    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded